Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Speech by Feisal Abdul Rauf at the Daniel Pearl Memorial.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 05:49 PM
Original message
Speech by Feisal Abdul Rauf at the Daniel Pearl Memorial.
This is a PDF, so if you click on it, the page will either download to your drive or open in your browser.
Ask yourself, are these the words of a dangerous radical?

http://www.bj.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/daniel_pearl_memorial.pdf


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. His statement supporting the Iranian regime and its jurisprudence, a
Edited on Thu Aug-19-10 06:24 PM by snagglepuss
justice system which, you may recall, along side with other medieval barbarities, sentences women including pregnant women and men to death by stoning, should also be read.





http://www.cordobainitiative.org/?q=content/what-president-obama-should-say-about-irans-election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He was supporting the concept of rule of law, not any specific rule.
I saw nothing controversial in his message. He was giving advice on how Obama should handle the situation in Iran at that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hogwash. There is no rule of law in Iran. The stoning sentence of
Edited on Thu Aug-19-10 09:21 PM by snagglepuss
Sakineh Mohammadie Ashtiani makes that perfectly clear, if it wasn't eminientlty clear before this latest travesty.


By the way where is Imam Rauf's statement condemning the stoning? An international plea for help by Ashtiani's children went out, please link to Rauf's response to that heart-wrenching plea. He got off his butt to write a statement defending the Iranian election.

Why would someone who has come to Irans's defense not lead a campaign to free Ashtiana and the others lined up to be stoned to death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He was calling for the peaceful resolution to the election,
and that all should adhere to the rule of law concerning the central authority. He wasn't passing any judgement on Sharia law. This was aimed at the Iranian government and the protesters, and how Obama should handle the situation. He was suggesting talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He is claiming it was a legitimate election and it wasn't legitimate. BTW
what about Raf's remaining mute about state sanctioned, clerical sanctioned stoning.


He is friendly with that despicable regime, wy didn't he denounce the barbarity and call for judicial reform in Iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Just because we haven't heard it doesn't mean he hasn't
said it through the media in the Mideast. If he said it here, it would be preaching to the choir.

BTW, here is what I have been basing my argument on.

Now, on the streets of Teheran and undoubtedly in high political circles behind the scenes, Iranians are asking themselves, has this election confirmed the legitimacy of the ruler?

President Obama has rightly said that his administration will not interfere with the internal affairs of Iran, unlike what happened in 1953. Now he has an opportunity to have a greater positive impact on Iranian-American relations.

He should say his administration respects many of the guiding principles of the 1979 revolution -- to establish a government that expresses the will of the people; a just government, based on the idea of Vilayet-i-faqih, that establishes the rule of law.

His administration understands that what is going on now in Iran is an attempt by the Iranian people to live up to their own ideals. Just as American democracy developed over many years, the United States recognizes that this election is part of the process of an evolving democracy in Iran.

That would send a resounding message to the Iranian presidential candidates and their supporters that President Obama understands the ideals of the Islamic Republic and that he seeks a peaceful and harmonious Iran that has the unquestioned support of a majority of its population.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC