Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kentucky commandments backers plan appeal optimistic of new Supreme Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 06:31 PM
Original message
Kentucky commandments backers plan appeal optimistic of new Supreme Court
Two Kentucky counties that narrowly lost a battle before the U.S. Supreme Court five years ago to put up a display with the Ten Commandments in their courthouses are planning a new appeal to the nation's top court, hoping its new, more conservative makeup will help them win this time.

The plan comes after appeals courts allowed a similar display in two other Kentucky counties, and the American Civil Liberties Union declined to appeal those rulings to the high court.

ACLU lawyer William Sharp confirmed his group would not be appealing a ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this year that allowed a display that included the Ten Commandments to be reinstated in Grayson County in Western Kentucky.

Sharp declined to state the reason, saying “that's a matter that would remain between us and the client.”

But his opposing lawyer, Mathew Staver of the Virginia-based Liberty Counsel, was quick to offer an explanation for why he thinks the ACLU isn't appealing — and for why his group plans to appeal the separate 2005 case involving McCreary and Pulaski counties.

“They're counting votes as 5-4 against them,” he said. “It's pretty clear to everyone” that the Supreme Court has shifted with the more conservative Justice Samuel Alito replacing Sandra Day O'Connor.

http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20100817/NEWS01/308170074/Kentucky+commandments+backers+plan+appeal+optimistic+of+new+Supreme+Court


They won't get a larger stamp of approval on their religious beliefs by the State unless one of our allies is stupid enough to appeal at this point in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which what stare decisis is supposed to be about if conservatives
actually cared about such things. They are the true activists overturning precedents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC