Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Racist acrimony against Obama & in general: Is it backlash?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:12 PM
Original message
Racist acrimony against Obama & in general: Is it backlash?
...

The unexpected thing is how poignant that event, so spectacular then, looks in light of the 19 months of acrimony to which Obama and his presidency have been subjected.

...

As for the backlash, Michaels adds, it's everywhere and it's growing. It's in the way Michele Obama's been pilloried for being stylish while vacationing in Spain (contrast this with how Jackie Kennedy was idolized for charming the French, he says). It's in the right-wing mockery of Barack Obama's name, birthplace, religion and alleged radicalism.


http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/local-filmmaker-cash-michaels-on-obama-wake-schools-and-race-in-nc/Content?oid=1625104
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. It is blacklash n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't see it so much as backlash as
hate and spite that was hidden until now..it was unacceptable to spout it in public..except against us homos that is.

This has been simmering under the surface for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Thanks to the media
it is once again fashionable to display one's racism in public. I didn't believe I would see the day again. It is debatable whether it is necessary for a certain kind of cleansing but regardless it sure does hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. The squeaky wheel is getting the grease.
Think of all the people who voted for Obama. They/we are still here, but all we hear from are those who are not content.

Things that make you go hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Would the racism against the Blacks be as strong if Hillary would have won the presidency?
Edited on Sun Aug-29-10 08:28 PM by Bobbieo
Or is this a pre-destined phenomena? Illegal immigtation has brought on the blacklash against the Hispanics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. That's a good question.
I think it wouldn't. Well, let me put it this way: I think the racism has been there but underground and hidden until Obama was elected, then it resurfaced. If Hillary had been elected, maybe it would have stayed hidden - but it would still be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. No. But the rethugs had a bucketful of (bogus?) crap to
sling against a wall regarding the Clintons. It would have been as bad, but for different reasons. We would have been actually reliving history! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. And there would have been thinly veiled sexism everywhere...
you can bet on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Backlash... all should have seen it coming.
This is very serious to those who feel disenfranchised (!) by there being a Black president. White chauvinists feel under siege, much like Afrikaners in South Africa in the 1980s. It's not the "last gasp" of white racism, but it is getting close to it. Perhaps 50 years from now, we will see the last gasp. For now, it is entirely possible for white racists to seize the reins of power. We must be alert, vigilant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. We definitely must be alert and vigilant...I am concerned
about all the ignorants buying into the hate/Beck/Tea Party/Koch/ crap. Their M.O. is hate and fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I've spent my whole life listening to this racist crap in this country directed toward
one group or another. There is an element in this country that always wants to hate one group or another. It really gets disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. it was planned, and in many ways is no different than the reaction to clinton
the republicans simply decided to complain, obstruct, malign, belittle, distract, scandalize, impeach, whine, and generally throw as much mud as possible because to republicans, the best defense is a good temper tantrum.


they're doing the same thing against obama. the scandals have become sillier and more outrageous, but are every bit as stupid and manufactured as the "travelgate" and "hillary murdered vince foster" fabrications. oh, and she's a lesbian, didn't you know?

what's (only slightly) different is which mud sticks. because much of their base is racist, any "scandal" that makes obama appear as "other" resonates, so that's what they run with. hence, obama is a foreigner and/or islamic and/or a socialist and/or a nazi. their base doesn't really know what those words actually mean, they only know the connotation is bad and alien.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. where's the racist backlash against clarence thomas?
lefties who object to his decisions don't object to his skin color.
righties who object to his skin color hold their tongues because they like his decisions. or his ratification of scalia's decisions, to be more precise.

had powell or keyes or any other black become president (ugh!) and been a nice loyal republican, you wouldn't have heard much of anything racist. again, lefties would have complained on the issues, republicans would have kept silent on race.

the EXISTANCE of a "backlash" is 100% a function of the fact that obama is a DEMOCRAT.

the FORM of the "backlash" is somewhat shaped by his race.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. interesting analysis unblock
I can see how you may have a point there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. Interesting article and shows how a backlash should have been expected by people who know history.
"It was surprising, that is, until a few minutes into the film when Obama in NC took a sweeping U-turn into the past—setting the campaign aside to deal with first things first. As Michaels delights in saying, "You're invited to a campaign film and suddenly history breaks out."

It's the history of racism in North Carolina and the heroic struggles against it since Reconstruction, powerfully depicted and climaxing—but not for almost two hours—with Obama's election. A central struggle in the mid-20th century is whether Raleigh's schools would be integrated or segregated.
In North Carolina, the South's "education state" (that was Martin Luther King's term, according to his friend the Rev. Dr. David Forbes, then a student at Shaw University), nothing could be more important to the future—or more relevant to today.
At the film's end, the GSIW audience stood clapping, cheering and hearing a clear message about their own cause.
"The message is, our history matters," said Lynn Edmonds, a pro-diversity activist. "When you understand the history, the struggles to bring our citizens to a common and moral ground," said Yevonne Brannon, the coalition's leader, "it makes it clear why it's important to fight this fight in Wake County, and why winning it is an historical imperative."

Michaels was only dimly aware of North Carolina's history when he was covering Obama. That's because, though it may seem that he was born reporting the news here, he grew up and began his working career in Brooklyn, N.Y. Like many of us, he knew something about the 1898 Wilmington Riots, the 1960 Greensboro sit-ins, the Ku Klux Klan. What he didn't know, but learned after he followed some friends' advice to add a bit of "historical context" to what was intended to be a campaign film, is how these events and others bled into a racist stain as deep as any Southern state's, one North Carolina has covered over but will not soon expunge.

Set against this North Carolina history, Obama's victories here—in the Democratic primary over Hillary Clinton and then, by an eyelash, over Republican John McCain in November 2008—become both more incredible than you may have thought (especially if you're white) and less a breakthrough than a milestone on the tortuous trail of black history, in which every step forward was followed by white backlash.

-snip-
"Which only proves," Michaels says, "what history teaches, that all things are cyclical."
"Seeing a black family in the White House is something that some people simply cannot take," Michaels says. "What was 1898 about in Wilmington? 'We don't want to be under Negro rule.' Well, what is the Tea Party about in 2010? 'We don't want to be under Negro rule.'"
The backlash is present in the Wake schools battle too, he says, where the issue boils down today—as it did in 1956—to: "We have schools for you. We have schools for us."


In that vein, Obama in NC is prescient in dramatizing the battle over school integration in Raleigh a half-century ago—a struggle that lasted well into the 1970s—as pivotal in the state's progress, pitting liberal educators, clergy and the NAACP against conservatives like the onetime Raleigh broadcaster, and later senator, Jesse Helms.
There's a line in the film spoken in Raleigh in 1988 by Coretta Scott King, Dr. King's widow. Mrs. King was here because North Carolina had finally adopted MLK's birthday as a state holiday, surmounting the backlash against integration fomented by, among others, Sen. Helms.
North Carolina's action showed, Mrs. King said with a wry smile, "that we are not helpless, and the situation is not hopeless."'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. More likely a last gasp.
A vicious animal will become even more dangerous & aggressive when it's cornered & has nowhere to go to escape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-10 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Or
Republicans become vicious, cornered animals when they lose elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC