Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Check Out These Poll Trend Lines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 05:53 PM
Original message
Check Out These Poll Trend Lines
Edited on Thu Sep-02-10 05:57 PM by louis c
Gallup has the approval poll numbers for the Presidents going back to Harry Truman. You can compare Obama with Clinton and Reagan at the same point in each Presidency. The trend lines are eerily similar. The only difference being that Obama is actually ahead of both of them in the same elapsed time in office (Obama 43%-Clinton-39%-Reagan-42%). By the way, both Reagan and Clinton won overwhelming second terms.


link:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Approval-Center.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reagan and Clinton won easy reelections
Carter didn't. And Clinton had to "end the era of big government".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama won with 54% of the popular vote.
He is now down 11% points.

Clinton only won 43% of the popular vote (Perot factor) so he was down only 4%.

JFTR - Clinton didn't even get a majority of votes when re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. perot factor, again. still, he got 70% of the electoral votes and 55% of the dem&rep vote
if perot hadn't won and clinton had won a mere 10% of the perot voters, he would have had a majority in the popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What does this have to do with the OP? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. i replied to your post, not the o.p.
you pointed out that clinton didn't get an outright majority of the popular vote in 1996. i just supplied a bit of context and analysis. clinton won showed more strongly than it might appear from that one statistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. by the sound of those fuckers on CNN
Obama has a 1% favourable rating and its dropping fast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Polls are a joke, and more often used to shape public opinion than to measure it....
..."my poll says Americans love Republicans. Jump on board." What bull. Gallop among the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I Don't Want to Clutter Your Mind with the Facts, But............
Here's a run down of all the polls leading up to the final vote in 2008.

Rather than a joke, they were very, very accurate. We ignore polls to our own peril.

Link:
http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Nonsense. Hop over to 538 and educate yourself. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The Numbers I Posted are False?
The only way to test the accuracy of poll numbers is to match them with the actual vote. So far, the national numbers are within a point or two of each other every time. What a coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC