Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woman fears police will use nude pix

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:52 PM
Original message
Woman fears police will use nude pix
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 03:52 PM by uppityperson
http://www.upi.com/Odd_News/2010/09/03/Woman-fears-police-will-use-nude-pix/UPI-60201283537950/
An Illinois woman police say is a suspect in a car vandalism case says she fears what officers will do with the nude pictures on her confiscated cellphone.

Bridget Polaski, 45, said she was stopped while walking to her Romeoville home from Walmart Aug. 6 and officers confiscated her phone, The (Joliet ,Ill.) Herald-News reported Friday. Polaski said one of the officers "asked me if my boobs were fake or real -- asked me straight out."

Polaski, who was detained for about 2 hours, said she heard officers at the police station laughing about her "fully nude" pictures on the iPhone. "I'm just really upset about my pictures being all over the Internet, if that's where they end up landing," Polaski said.

Deputy Police Chief Mark Turvey said no officers viewed the pictures and the phone was taken because Polaski is a suspect in a car vandalism case. "She's a suspect in a criminal damage to property investigation and the officer had reason to believe she had text messages on her phone related to the damage and some threats she had made," Turvey said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Um..the real question is ..Why does she have nude pics of herself on HER phone
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Um...because she took them? Why not have picts on your own phone?
Why should the police be able to view them is more the real question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left coaster Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I agree, absolutely!
An adult woman, or man, should be able to have those pics on their own phone. Is it really legal for law enforcement to invade your privacy this way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left coaster Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Techno glitch, double post. Pardon. nt
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 05:01 PM by left coaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Why the fuck not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Ummm... because phones get lost or misplaced or stolen or confiscated?
Just a stab in the dark there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Photos never get lost , misplaced , stolen, or confiscated
only on cell phones, right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Well there's no nekkid photos of me on my computer either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Nor of me, on mine.
Poor thing probably would not survive the download.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. They are probably on the cops phones by now, LOL.
Why do people email nude pics? I don't get it? Maybe I'm just old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. While I can understand her plight, the simple fact is
If you don't want anyone to see nude pics of you, DON'T TAKE THEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thread useless without those pics.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left coaster Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. OK, that made me laugh. I was being outraged, if you dont mind! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Former Stripper Wants Nude Pics Back from Cops:
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 04:06 PM by mike r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. "I had a couple ex-boyfriends ask me to send them a picture"
like your ex-BFs wouldn't be above posting the pictures

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Would the cops need a warrant before looking through her phone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Cellphone is like computer - police must have warrant to search:
http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2009/12/15/cell_phone_decision.html

Police can't search the contents of a cell phone without a warrant unless they have reason to think their lives are in danger, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled today in a split decision. The court said a cell phone is not a "container" -- whose contents police may examine without a warrant -- but closer to a computer, which requires a warrant to search.

---------------------------

I hope this is the case in other states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. Another title I saw for this story after a quick search for more "info"..
"Former Stripper Wants Nude Pics Back From Cops"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 05:27 PM
Original message
Someone else posted that here too. Doesn't matter to me, even if she was a former stripper.
if they had warrant to look @ texts, they shouldn't have been looking @ pictures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. with that, I agree, wholeheartedly
we seem to have forgotten what the 4th amendment is really about.

thanx

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. dupe
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 05:28 PM by uppityperson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. Good reason to enable the unlock code on your phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. Pigs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. Don't the police need a warrant to execute a search of the phone's contents?
Oh, right. That was BEFORE their USA PATRIOT Act voided the Fourth Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supply Side Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
26. LOOK OVER THERE LOOK OVER THERE!!!
Anything to mis-direct her guilt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC