|
Edited on Mon Sep-06-10 08:24 AM by Solly Mack
"The problem with this war for many Americans is that the premise on which we justified going to war proved not to be valid," - Even if the outcome is a good one from the standpoint of the United States, it will always be clouded by how it began."
He's not saying invading Iraq was wrong. (It was)
He's not saying we shouldn't have invaded.(We shouldn't have)
He's not saying the entire enterprise was one big pile of shit, lies, trumped up evidence & war crimes. (Which it was)
Look at his choice of phrasing "premise on which we justified going to war proved not to be valid"
Which premise? WMD? Yellow cake? Spreading democracy? Saddam is bin Laden's buddy? Bush's premise changed all the time - and all he told were lies and trumped up evidence.
"not to be valid"
How lame is that phrasing? How mild even. How different that sounds on the ears than just telling the truth and saying *Bush lied*
He's saying the problem is that some Americans won't see the good (and make no mistake, the US is framing it as a good) of it - because of how the war started.
So his remarks weren't meant to bring attention to the reasons for the invasion.....but to get out the framing that the problem wasn't the war or how it came about - but the people who refuse to see the good to the U.S. in the outcome.
He's saying the beginning doesn't matter....he is saying the end justifies the means - and that "many Americans" (such as myself) are just refusing to see the "good" of it all. He was pointing the finger away from the lies and at people like myself.
Such framing allows those who don't plan to forget the lies, trumped evidence & the crimes to be labeled as malcontents or "playing politics" - to marginalize us and in the doing, marginalize the reasons ( the lies, the crimes, etc..) we think as we do.
It's part and parcel to the revision of America's war crimes.
The media got the message.
|