|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:46 AM Original message |
Obama getting fewer judges confirmed than Nixon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one_voice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
1. What they're doing is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. Because judges matter for DECADES. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
3. And this White House is just letting it happen. Recess them all today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. recess appointments are worthless for judges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Fine. Let the GOP oppose sitting judges getting things done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. they wouldn't be sitting judges on jan 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
n2doc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. Obama needs to nominate more also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomCADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
9. The Cable Media Will Hide This Or Blame Obama For Not Being Bi-Partisan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC