|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:25 PM Original message |
When Did Being An Ardent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. When did it become okay for Democrats to adopt Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Oddly enough, the Republicans have worked very hard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:14 PM Response to Reply #4 |
38. Democrats passed welfare "reform" that permanently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #38 |
58. You may wanna check the facts there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 06:14 PM Response to Reply #58 |
85. Democrats were a minority at the time, and that was a very |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democracy1st (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:22 PM Response to Reply #85 |
99. not only did he sign those he lied to get them passed! telecommunications act ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:43 PM Response to Reply #85 |
105. there was not substantial support in the House for Welfare Reform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 12:23 AM Response to Reply #105 |
111. Vetoing a different simlar bill doesn't absolve him for signing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 01:11 AM Response to Reply #111 |
119. it has nothing to do with more of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democracy1st (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:20 PM Response to Reply #58 |
98. He's correct bill Clinton pushed for Welfare reform,1996 telecommunications act and Nafta! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:30 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. Bill Clinton is not, and never was, the Democratic Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democracy1st (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:38 PM Response to Reply #100 |
103. link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:46 PM Response to Reply #103 |
107. and that proves what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democracy1st (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:48 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. Presidents are leaders of the party,give it a break this Goldman Sachs admin has been wrong from the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 12:42 AM Response to Reply #108 |
117. got it, only the fuehrer counts, le etat, c'est moi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
47. You are correct about the Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 05:39 PM Response to Reply #4 |
84. Republicans forced him to lift the ban on Offshore drilling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democracy1st (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:33 PM Response to Reply #84 |
101. 2 days stick out in my mind,the day his economic team was announced and the day he let Joe Leiberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 12:37 AM Response to Reply #4 |
115. Really? Did they obstruct the escalation of war in Afghanistan and Pakistan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:39 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. That's my hope, too. I just hope that enough people turn out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Every two years we get this chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. That's what I'd think too, but I worry that inaction among people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. Yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
39. Really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. When electronic voting machines got going? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:37 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. A sincere question: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:50 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Not much now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:00 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. I want Democrats that act like Democrats, not neoliberals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
23. When was the DLC formed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:17 PM Response to Reply #23 |
41. Exellent question, and I think you've nailed it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
2. Please Check if You Are Still Ardent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. Nope, not yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
36. Nope, I have bile in my throat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
61. I am an ARDENT supporter of the following: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Art_from_Ark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 12:13 AM Response to Reply #61 |
110. It might be a generational thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
3. Rick Warren at the inauguration didn't help.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. So, you think people started working against Obama on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Could you be more specific about "working against Obama"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. MineralMan is including thought crimes like recognizing that Rick Warren |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:13 PM Response to Reply #25 |
37. I am guilty of thought crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 05:12 AM Response to Reply #25 |
125. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
22. There are even fundamentalist ministers that are not raging homophobes.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:50 PM Response to Reply #22 |
52. Warren is just as bad for women and for Jews. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 03:02 PM Response to Reply #52 |
70. "YOU ARE NOT GOING TO RUIN THIS FOR THE REST OF US." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 04:15 PM Response to Reply #70 |
81. You bet I do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
49. Working against? No. Losing faith? Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 05:11 AM Response to Reply #7 |
124. Criticism of Obama ="Working against Obama" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
50. OMG I forgot about Rick Warren. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:28 PM Response to Reply #50 |
59. Warren was highly effective.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. You give Warren way too much power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:40 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Obama's the one who gave Warren the power to alienate a solid Dem constituency.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:45 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. I certainly can't change your mind, but I didn't see it that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 03:00 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. If you were gay, and Warren had just successfully campaigned to strip you of a basic civil right, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 03:11 PM Response to Reply #69 |
74. I'm not gay, but my transsexual sister is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 03:30 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. Like you said, you're not gay, but you know how you would feel about this issue if you were. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Well I'm very close with my sister and know what she has been through. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
6. If we lose everything we gained in 2008 in the election in 2010 it won't be because of DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
94. Democrats will lose because they are NOT PROGRESSIVE ENOUGH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
9. How could you forget the Hillary vs Obama vs Edwards factions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. I didn't join until late in the game, so I must have missed a lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
10. Deleted message |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. +10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ismnotwasm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
11. What I've noticed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:45 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. That's a good sign. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
42. I'm voting a straight Democratic ticket too, but you might not like my reasoning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 09:07 AM Response to Reply #42 |
134. I really don't care why you're doing it. Every vote helps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:00 PM Response to Reply #11 |
31. It's rather meaningless because Repubs despise EVERY Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ismnotwasm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:56 PM Response to Reply #31 |
53. I thought of that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:04 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. The same could be said for people who support the president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ismnotwasm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:36 PM Response to Reply #55 |
63. Not very many is my guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 03:00 PM Response to Reply #63 |
68. Agreed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steely_Dan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
14. The Same Level... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. But that doesn't represent the ardent support needed to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steely_Dan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Indeed n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socialist_n_TN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:59 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. It's hard to be an ARDENT supporter when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
43. Yeah, I've lost my ardent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #19 |
44. Then you should stop making excuses for right-of-center "Democrats", and start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 08:56 AM Response to Reply #44 |
132. I'm not blaming the "voters." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 01:52 PM Response to Reply #132 |
137. Yeah... that's blaming voters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
21. I am an ardent supporter of the President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
27. It's not a bad thing. Never was. There is, however, a small but highly vocal crew of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Spiro Agnew, is that you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:09 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Lol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
28. When a small group of rude people who want to make it impossible to hold our... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VMI Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
29. When did ardent supporters start belittling and minimizing the concerns of oppressed citizens? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
33. I am an Ardent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 03:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
73. You're confusing the category "Democrats" with something else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
34. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
40. Deleted message |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
46. because it often blinds the follower |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
56. Actually, if you had been willing to LISTEN to people instead of criticising them, you would have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 08:11 PM Response to Reply #56 |
87. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:40 PM Response to Reply #56 |
104. says the guy who lashes out at people on his own si.... oh never mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
57. Look at what you wrote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
60. I actively support President Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:57 PM Response to Reply #60 |
67. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morning Dew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
66. It's hard to ardently support an adminstration and candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peacetrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
71. Damned if I know. Democrats have been talked about like dogs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
72. I'm hoping that a silent, sensible majority exists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoseGaspar (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
75. You seem to enjoy conflating entirely independent subjects. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 03:25 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Deleted message |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 04:57 PM Response to Reply #75 |
83. Why are people disgusted with a "neoliberal" Democratic majority that doesn't actually exist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoseGaspar (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 06:18 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. Let us consider the question, shall we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 09:49 PM Response to Reply #86 |
93. Just because I don't use time to respond to every one of your obvious mischaracterizations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoseGaspar (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:01 PM Response to Reply #93 |
96. "Crickets" would have been a better response... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:35 PM Response to Reply #96 |
102. Once again, you fail on your own terms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoseGaspar (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 02:03 AM Response to Reply #102 |
120. You are fading... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 02:47 AM Response to Reply #120 |
123. More bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Panaconda (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 07:22 AM Response to Reply #123 |
127. This might help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 07:27 AM Response to Reply #127 |
129. Except progressive economists that NEVER went into industry and finance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 11:22 AM Response to Reply #120 |
135. When someone punctuates their points "with little yellow cartoons" on DU, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 04:47 PM Response to Reply #135 |
141. Not really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoseGaspar (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-08-10 03:01 PM Response to Reply #135 |
144. Thank you for the translation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
77. "The Democratic Party is the graveyard of progressive ideas." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
80. It started when Obama became President ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
82. Funny you should ask: how about when they started keeping Bush era policies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
88. Don't be scared. You've been watching too much TV. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angee_is_mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
89. Not quite correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
90. When did personalities become more important than principles? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
91. Supporting politicians over policy and party over principles has always ben a "bad thing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
92. Here's something that I find very "telling" about current perceptions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 07:57 AM Response to Reply #92 |
130. Thanks for the well-reasoned post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bkozumplik (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
95. fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
97. When did you stop beating your wife? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:45 PM Response to Reply #97 |
106. looks like he struck a nerve. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-06-10 11:49 PM Response to Reply #106 |
109. Yes, but I think you miss which nerve. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
metapunditedgy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
112. Look if you can't move past this talking point: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
113. I think I've finally figured out what goes on here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 12:40 AM Response to Reply #113 |
116. I'll add another unfortunate thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 12:49 AM Response to Reply #116 |
118. While I agree with most of what you said, I don't think they are doing it to the exclusion of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
114. duplicate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
121. When "ardent" came to mean "unthinking". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 02:28 AM Response to Original message |
122. Some are more ardent than others. Chad has always been very ardent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 02:11 PM Response to Reply #122 |
139. Does Chad have a Facebook page?...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 05:15 AM Response to Original message |
126. The troll infestation at DU is in direct proportion to it's perceived |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
128. There would be the same number of ardent supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 08:02 AM Response to Original message |
131. The bandwagon encountered a significant GOP obstruction, and lots of folks fell off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 08:58 AM Response to Reply #131 |
133. So it seems. Time to load that wagon back up, I think, or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 04:57 PM Response to Reply #133 |
142. Agree completely ... the GOP has gone nuts ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
136. When did it become ok for republicans to take my vote for granted just because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
138. Perhaps you mean well, but the rhetorical questions in the OP are divisive and misleading. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 02:55 PM Response to Reply #138 |
140. +1. We don't need Brownshirtesque loyalty oaths, we need Change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-07-10 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
143. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC