Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Murkowski's Write-In Campaign - What Are Her Chances? - The Mudflats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 10:27 PM
Original message
Murkowski's Write-In Campaign - What Are Her Chances? - The Mudflats
A well thought-out analysis of what Lisa's write-in campaign means for our November election. Get our your popcorn. :popcorn:


http://www.themudflats.net/2010/09/17/murkowskis-write-in-campaign-what-are-her-chances/



The supporters have been rallied, the big announcement has been made and Senator Lisa Murkowski is off and running on her whirlwind write-in campaign!

So what are her actual chances of winning?

1) There is the problem of her name.

Lisa Murkowski…doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue or the pen. However, it looks like a write-in won’t be as stringent as was once thought. Just “Lisa” would not be enough according to outgoing Lt. Gov. Craig Campbell. However, voters would not need to spell Murkowski’s name correctly if “intent could be ascertained” according to Division of Elections Director Gail Fenumiai…even “Lisa M” is a possibility. However, there are rumblings of problems (see item 4).

2) There is the problem of the “oval.”

Alaska uses the cards and card-reading machines. So, even though a voter may have written Lisa Murkowski’s name perfectly, it doesn’t count if they don’t color-in the oval next to it for the machine to read. This particular issue is of concern to those who have questions about machine tampering — the only way to catch a ballot that does have the dot colored in but was somehow unread by the machine is in a recount.

<snip>

So, what are Senator Murkowski’s chances? If you judge by the enthusiasm of her supporters, she has a shot. If you judge by the practicalities of a write-in campaign in general, her chances aren’t good. If you judge based on the write-in campaigns in Alaska’s history, she has no chance at all.

So the question you have to ask yourself…do you believe in unicorns?

Stay tuned and break out your popcorn…

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wrote in Hooward Dean.
YEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
life_long_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. “Lisa M” is a possibility? WTF. There is only one Lisa M. in the
whole state? How is that proving intent?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I predict that we won't know who our senator is
until well into next year ... unless, of course, Scott McAdams gets a clear victory.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Will this move by LMurk split the vote sufficiently to give McAdams a shot?
Curious as to your perspective on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's anybody's guess, really.
Edited on Sat Sep-18-10 02:23 AM by Blue_In_AK
My fear is that she will split the "reasonable" vote that otherwise would have gone to McAdams. I think Scott may have had more of a chance in a head to head against Miller because the differences were so clear-cut, but Lisa kind of muddies the water.

One thing is for sure -- it will be a bloodbath on the Republican side, and the Alaska Republican Party will never be the same, no matter who wins. Our Republicans were pretty predictable and unified for a long, long time -- Ted Stevens/Don Young types -- but the Palinistas have staged a coup, and it's not going over so well with the old line party. Murkowski issued a statement saying the party had been "hijacked." :rofl:

I'm hoping that maybe Murkowski and Miller will both look so bad during the remainder of the campaign with all the mud-slinging that Scott will come out looking like the grown-up. It'll be interesting.

Over 60% of registered voters here are not affiliated with either major party, so anything could happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Love Republican infighting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC