Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans urge more "business-friendly" successor to Summers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 02:42 PM
Original message
Republicans urge more "business-friendly" successor to Summers
By Caren Bohan Caren Bohan – 26 mins ago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Republicans on Wednesday urged President Barack Obama to pick a more business-friendly successor to economic adviser Larry Summers, a move that would signal a shift to the center.

---

"We'd like to see someone who had good understanding of what it takes to create private-sector jobs," Senator Lamar Alexander, chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, said in an interview at the Reuters Washington Summit.

---

With the personnel decisions he is weighing, Obama faces a choice of either going toe to toe with Republicans and facing policy gridlock or signaling a move to the center, said William Galston, a former policy adviser to President Bill Clinton.

"In recent days there have been indications that the White House is contemplating the beginnings of the second option, with a new economic approach focused on reducing the long-term budget deficit and getting private capital off the sidelines," Galston wrote in an opinion piece in the Financial Times.

"If so, the president needs a senior economic advisor who can help him execute this strategy," he said.

Such a candidate would be someone with a reputation for advocating fiscal restraint and would have strong ties to the business community, he said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100922/pl_nm/us_obama_economy_summers



Nice skewing, huh? Apparently, not only the republicans, but also Reuters, feel that Larry Summers, champion of NAFTA and deregulation, is a wacky liberal.

At this point, knowing how scared this White House is at being criticized by the media, anyone left of Jack Welch is probably out of the running. Obama might as well just get it over with and appoint Sarah Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That sums it up very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gosh, better do what the Republicans say
Don't want to appear partisan! And, of course, even if Obama were to appoint Charles Koch, the Republicans would bitch that he wasn't business friendly enough, and refuse any cooperation.

Then they'd set up the next issue and do it all over again, and we could listen to more earnest lectures about how much the Obama administration has done, and while you're buried up to your neck in shit, why aren't you glad you're not buried up to your nose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Appoint Fidel Castro to replace him. Maybe the right can then identify actual communists.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bernie Madoff is available, but he's not free. Madoff is a republican wet dream selection.
Madoff would be a republican wet dream selection to replace Summers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hmmm
They are going to get really mad then if Anne Mulcahey is selected. She's a Democrat - and was quoted on CIO's web site in late 2008 as 'now being an Obama Democrat'.
This was in response to Carly Fiorina suggesting her as a running mate for McCain. In true Mulcahey fashion - she brought it back to business . . . "I'm on the other side of the ledger".

My only concern is her approach to H1-B Visas, but if you dig down deep - she's stating it's good IF these folks come here and create business to employee Americans. So not all bad.

Here's where she's good - she focused on the customer and the consumer. She started a green initiative (I'm friends with the woman running it out of Rochester - my hometown). She doesn't believe in kowtowing to: The Board, The Stockholders, The Banks.

She doesn't believe that's how you get results and 'turn things around'.

What the Republicans REALLY want? Is someoen who will be 'loyal to Wall Street' as opposed to the people. She's not going to fit that bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. no, the republicans want someone that will not enforce regulations
that will allow them to cheat workers out of pay, cut the paid time off and make the working class grovel for some crumbs. Jeeez, even a blind guy can see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yep
And she also wouldn't do that. ;-) She knows an unhappy employee hurts profits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. maybe they shouldnt have run a moron and a twit for the White House, Our win, our pick
but alas, I know Obama will cave and prob pick an oil exec or defaulted bank ceo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well let's see. Are there any Third Reich or Mussolini economic advisers alive? Is that
"centrist" enough for them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC