Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP’s ‘Pledge To America’ Is To Ask Americans How To Solve America’s Problems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:26 PM
Original message
GOP’s ‘Pledge To America’ Is To Ask Americans How To Solve America’s Problems
During the roll-out of the House GOP’s “Pledge to America” gimmick, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) was asked for specifics on how his colleagues would balance the budget and cut the deficit, but he wasn’t able to hide the fact that document falls short on details. “I don’t have all of the solutions,” Boehner said, adding that the American people “will help us get the answers.”

Noting Boehner’s dodge, MSNBC host Chris Jansing today asked Rep. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) — a key GOP lawmaker involved with the “Pledge” — to help the Minority Leader out. “Can you tell us how, specifically, you’re going to cut spending?” Jansing asked. But like Boehner, Cassidy came up fairly empty, only offering the old GOP fallback of “tort reform” — saying it would save $54 billion over ten years — and ending the benefits enshrined in the new health care law. Echoing Boehner again, Cassidy said the GOP will ask Americans for answers, which Jansing called a “cop out”:

JANSING: Isn’t that a cop out? … If you’re going to say, “Here’s our pledge.” Don’t you have to say, “Here specifically is what we pledge to do”? Don’t say, “American people, I know you elected us to find answers but we’re waiting for you to give us the answers.”


Watch it: http://thinkprogress.org/2010/09/23/goppledge-ask-americans/

To be clear, the proposal Cassidy is offering to reduce spending and reduce the $1.4 trillion deficit is to enact a law that may save $54 billion in ten years. Moreover, according to the CBO, which Cassidy cited for his figures, getting rid of the new health care law would actually increase the deficit by $143 billion.

But the fact that the GOP’s new “Pledge” does not answer these questions should come as no surprise. Republicans have been asked repeatedly over the past year what federal spending they would cut to bring down the debt and deficit and can never come up with an answer.

Read more about the “Pledge to America” in today’s Progress Report.
http://pr.thinkprogress.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. and
the "Americans" they are talking about are the tea baggers because republicans believe the only true "americans" are other religious extremist rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. "taking back america" from the MAJORITY who elected the dems.
FYI, republics, cut the DoD in half - deficit solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karnac Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. As IF americans have the answers..
Democrats all the way!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I know how to solve America's problems but they won't like it
If every single Republican Member of Congress, without exception, would commit Seppuku on the White House lawn (I would suggest they do it on the Capitol steps, but blood doesn't come out of marble very easily) that would solve about 90 percent of what ails America.

I read that God-awful document in its entirety. The fuckers go on and on and on about how the Democrats are spending too much money, and then suggest one way to get America back on the winning track is to put more money into researching strategic missile defense. Y'know, guys, we've pumped about two TRILLION dollars (that's with a T, that's with four commas) into missile defense and the only thing we've got that even kinda works is the Patriot PAC-2 system, which is only good for tactical threats. Worse, the Patriot hits the missile body and not the missile nose--so when the debris lands the warhead is still intact and still blows the shit out of a school the enemy wasn't trying to hit instead of the city hall that was their actual target. (I don't know about you guys, but if a building WILL get blown up and you've got to choose between a building full of corrupt politicians or a building full of third graders, I think I'd choose to blow up the politicians.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC