|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:12 PM Original message |
As I much as enjoy watching Rachel, her skills as an interviewer make me cringe at times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. You're kidding, right? Did you think Robinson was ruder than rude, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrcheerful (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. You said that better then I would have, since when does Rachel need to pandor to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Never, but she didn't even give him a fair shake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 10:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
35. Rachel wasn't rude, the guy was being aggressively rude to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Incitatus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 11:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
37. I didn't see the interview you are talking about, but did you really just say she should led people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. They were both rude. The whole tone of the interview was negative. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Rachael was not rude....maybe at the end when she had enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gabi Hayes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. I agree, in a way.... he was obviously a total jackwad, out of his mind, to boot, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
4. huh, really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
5. Welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. I'm really sick of getting "Welcome to DU" posts whenever I wear my Indy Progressive hat. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. People being friendly bothers you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. No, but I only seem to get welcomed when I make controversial threads. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:58 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Then don't make controversial threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 10:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. Methinks you enjoy being controversial. It's a sure way to get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 10:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
36. I disagree with your OP, but I must concede that the "Welcome to DU" replies are thinly-veiled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
6. Didn't see this interview, but she has never seemed like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seedersandleechers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
7. Rachel was great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
8. It was her responsibility as a citizen to slap that assclown around. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CommonSensePLZ (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. (+1) and she wasn't rude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 10:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
30. I'll go along with that. The Mad Scientist thought he was going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
secondwind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
9. You can't be serious! Rachel was fair and square and pulled no punches, just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
11. He started with at least 10 refusals to answer her question about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
12. I thought she was great as she always is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karnac (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
15. robinson was prepared. unlike rand paul |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:35 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Preparation, my ass. Behind that "I have advanced degrees" smile, he was sweating. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. Wow, there's a mixed message. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 10:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
32. He ended up doing more harm to himself than Rachel ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
16. No, you are wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
17. I'd welcome you too, but I notice you've been around for a while. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
19. Sacrilege! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Nah. To me, snarkiness implies a satirical intonation and wittiness. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
22. She was amaing and doing a great service! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radiclib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
26. OK I'm going to assume that you are sane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
31. WTF are you about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
33. We must have been watching different interviews |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansasVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-07-10 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
34. Well, when you have your own show you can do those things! -1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countmyvote4real (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
38. I just watched the replay and can't agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrcheerful (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 12:25 AM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Yep I too re watched it and right from the start the dick wad started playing the victim of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countmyvote4real (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 01:55 AM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Lord knows his positions could have evolved in the ensuing 15 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
39. Never, EVER criticize Rachel. Never. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Binka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
40. Welcome to IGNORE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
42. She actually did an amazing job, with the most illl-behaved interviewee imaginable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
43. Puh-lease |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kimi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-08-10 01:58 AM Response to Original message |
45. IMHO, I didn't see Rachel being snarky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC