Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chernobyl lurking in Himalaya's main rivers?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 12:47 AM
Original message
Chernobyl lurking in Himalaya's main rivers?
If concerted efforts are not made to recover two missing radiation detectors in the Himalayan ranges, another Chernobyl could erupt, poisoning two of Asia's biggest rivers, a Japanese filmmaker has warned.

Yoichi Shimatsu, a former editor of Japan Times who now runs an independent documentary-making agency, is asking all SAARC countries along with China and Unesco to mobilise search and recovery operations on the slopes of Mt Everest and another Himalayan range, the Nanda Devi, to locate two radiation detectors planted there by Western governments to spy on China's nuclear programme.

The Ganges and the Brahmaputra are under threat from these devices, says Shimatsu, who was here to release his presentation on the misuse of scientific research on Mt Everest.
more...

This is one scary article
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=250263
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. I find part of this strange.
The first part about the original attempt is, I believe, true. However, there would be absolutely no reason to plant such devices after the late 70s. Our nuclear surveilance capability is much greater via satellites, starting with the Velas in the 70s, than it ever would be with any remote monitoring station.

Anyway, the largest part of this is hyperbole. Chernobyl released anywhere between 20,000 and 350,000 pounds of uranium oxide, cesium, and other chemicals. This thing they're talking about is at most 4 pounds of plutonium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC