CNN:Analysis: A Sarah Palin moment (O'Donnell)

cal04

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-13-10 08:37 PM
Original message

CNN:Analysis: A Sarah Palin moment (O'Donnell)

Edited on Wed Oct-13-10 09:13 PM by cal04

By:
CNN Senior Political Analyst Gloria Borger
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/10/13/analysis-a-sarah-palin-moment/

8:49 p.m. – O’Donnell couldn't answer the same question that stumped Sarah Palin in her interview with Katie Couric — about recent Supreme Court decisions.

Another: Sarah Palin moment
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/13/odonnells-palin-moment/
O’Donnell’s Palin Moment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

livetohike

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-13-10 08:39 PM
Response to Original message

1. O'Donnell doesn't want to clutter up her beautiful mind with

facts like that :eyes:. Or any fact, for that matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Andy823

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-13-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. Well...

Could be she doesn't have a "human" mind because way back in the old days she had a brain switch with a mouse, then she got a secret clearance and found out about China's plan to take over America, and all of this happened when she was dwelling the the dark world of witchcraft! Poor girl doesn't know if she is coming or going withe that "mouse" brain she now has, but she does know she is in "lockstep and barrel" with the teabagger movement!! :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

livetohike

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-13-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #2

7. ROFL

:rofl: Thanks for the laugh :-).

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

lumpy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-13-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #1

3. Like Palin, O'Donnell has a problem with specifics. She verbally

wanders all over the place, very foxy in her 'answers'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

livetohike

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-13-10 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #3

8. I give credit to the female moderator for trying to get O'Donnell

to answer the questions. Wolf Blitzer should retire.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

gateley

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-13-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message

4. Check out trumad's post:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=9312423&mesg_id=9312423

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

whyverne

(734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-13-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message

5. Palin made 12 million bucks after flubbing her questions.

O’Donnell is just following the script.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

the redcoat

(510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-13-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message

6. The Fox method: "Some Supreme Court justices say..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Gman

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-13-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message

9. That makes her GOP presidential material

The dream team: Palin/O'Donnell

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Scurrilous

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-13-10 09:10 PM
Response to Original message

10. K & R

:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

petronius

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-13-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message

11. If she didn't have the guts to say Roe v. Wade or Lawrence v. Texas,

both of which would have pleased her base, couldn't she at least come up with Kelo? Pathetic. On the other hand, she's attractive and not a witch, so it all evens out...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:06 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.