Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pregnant new bride dies after being set on fire in garden

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 08:58 PM
Original message
Pregnant new bride dies after being set on fire in garden
Pregnant new bride dies after being set on fire in garden
By CHRIS BROOKE
Last updated at 1:06 PM on 16th October 2010


A pregnant woman has died after being found on fire in her garden.

Neighbours said the 23-year-old woman – named locally as Asiyah Khan – arrived in the country earlier this year and had an arranged marriage.
She was rarely seen outside the house, which she shared with her husband Naveed, mother-in-law and two sisters-in-law.

Scene: Police conduct their investigation in the street behind which the woman was found
Police were investigating the incident yesterday and it was not clear whether Mrs Khan had set herself on fire or had been set alight by someone else. No one has been arrested in connection with her death.

Emergency services were called to the residential street in Bradford at 7.15pm on Thursday, but Mrs Khan was pronounced dead at the scene.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1320700/Pregnant-new-bride-dies-set-garden.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Headline made me think Indian or Pakistani. damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. very interesting reading the comments....so racist!
The fact is, nobody at this point knows what happened, other than she was burnt, but how is not known. Was she happy or not, nobody in the comments knows, but they jump on the bandwagon with all sorts of assumptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What country - Where is the dateline on this story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Suich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's in Bradford, England, Bobbieo.
This is the most ridiculous comment:


"Fact- Arranged marriages are by and large successful- more successful than 'love'marriages. The divorce rates will confirm this.

Arranged marriages are NOT forced marriages- People need to learn to differentiate between the two."

Arg-h-h-h-h-h-h-h!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Thanks, Suich - sorta sounds like it could be in PA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. what's so ridiculous? arranged marriages *aren't* forced marriages, for the most part.
a good percent of marriages in japan are by arrangement -- by choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. The assumption that "not divorcing" is the definition of "success" in a marriage, for one thing.
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. as divorce *ends* a marriage, it's one reasonable definition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. So when divorces are not allowed, then all marriages are successful?
I don't think you'd really believe that. Even if divorce is legally possible, a society in which there is strong pressure against divorce will still have a lot of unhappy, and therefore unsuccessful, marriages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #29
37. No, it isn't! Divorce implies failure, but failure does *not* always imply divorce.
The reason cultures with arranged marriages have fewer divorces (if indeed they do) is almost certainly that they stigmatise divorce and a lot of people are pressured into staying in unhappy marriages which, in a more liberal culture, they could escape.

Divorce is a sufficient condition for failure of a marriage, but definately not a necessary one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Well, the fact is arranged and forced are different.....get over it and learn!
Forced is forced, arranged is arranged. Some arrangements are forced...making them forced, not arranged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. It's not quite that simple.
There's a whole continuum from "slight pressure" to "killed if you try to get out of it". A culture of arranged marriages puts considerably increased pressure on people to accept the marriages are arranged for them. Conversely, cultures which *don't* have arranged marriages very seldom have forced ones either.

So yes, it's entirely true that many - indeed, almost certainly most - arranged marriages are in no way forced, the two phenomena are inextricably linked, and any attempt to tackle the problem of forced marriages would almost certainly need to involve a modicum of opposition to arranged marriages too to have any chance of succeeding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
41. Exactly the idea that a young women w/ little or no means has choice is silly.
Where her family says the marriage is "arranged" and if you refuse we disown you. The prospect of an arranged marriage may seem preferable to risk of being homeless on the street. The idea that unless someone is forced there is free choice is a joke.

Like most things it is a shade of gray w/ absolute force backed by threats of violence to being disowned by ones family on the other end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I haven't read the comments, but India has a terrible trouble
with bride burning. Assumptions in this case may turn out to be warranted. How easy or common is it to set yourself on fire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Suicide is also an issue amongst women trapped in horrible situations. I knew one woman
from Sri Lanka who tried to kill herself by drinking something she found at the hardware store because of problems in her marriage. fortunately she was okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Families of burned brides often claim it was suicide.
Hard to prove, but I can't believe that most women would choose to die in such a miserable way. Slitting their wrists wouldn't cause nearly the agony, and most women would have easy access to knives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. I didn't mention the emotional abuse some women from the indian subcontinent go through before they
get suicidal. It is all horrific, whatever happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I'm going to jump on the bandwagon of assumptions
and blame religious fundamentalism and a misogynous culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left coaster Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. +1,000,000,000 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. but don't you see how wrong that is? How about innocent until
proven guilty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Innocence until guilt is proven is a legal construct.
Edited on Sun Oct-17-10 12:06 PM by Codeine
I am not obligation to follow that line of reasoning outside a jury room. Rumsfeld has never stood trial, but he is no less a war criminal for that.

This case walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and flaps it's feathered wings like a duck -- I will have no compunction against putting a sailor suit on it and naming it Donald .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Whether it was murder or suicide, I will still stand by my assertion. (no text)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
40. I bet most of these posters urging caution would be the first to jump on this story
If white fundamentalist Christians or polygamist Mormons were involved - they'd be the first to scream about how horrifically oppressive and backwards "superstition" and "Christofascism" is. But somehow, whenever non-Christian religious extremism is involved, we have to take a step back, and not make any assumptions, and realize that we don't know the details of the specific situation, and be sensitive of other cultures...

Bullshit. Fundamentalist, misogynist religion is either worthy of condemnation or it's not. You don't get to make exceptions because it's more politically correct to condemn one set of misogynist fundies over another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. sometimes there are good reasons for assumptions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Any more room on the bandwagon?
I brought my trumpet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
39. I will bring my guitar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. That's one reason why people shouldn't link to Daily Mail articles
It just gives more hits to a tabloid newspaper which both reflects and shapes the racist views of many of its readers. There are perfectly normal links for this story available instead:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5iiIJ17PArKQRgO_KExV__QkGwj2Q?docId=N0301811287198182626A
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bradford-west-yorkshire-11548859

In summary, the message, yet again, to American DUers is:

Don't link to the Daily Mail!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. +100...Daily Mail is a RW anti-Obama site
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. Every internet story - first they check out the race of those involved - then the racist comments
awful story. May she rest in peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. I guess if you are going to be set on fire, a garden is as nice a place for it as you can ask for
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. The British refer to the "garden" like we do "yards".
The garden is anything outside the house on your property. So it might not be a nice flower garden that Americans usually think of.

My English wife keeps reminding me we don't have a "yard" we have a garden.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Interesting... how did the British band Yardbirds pick their name, then?
I wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Since they played R&B, ie American music, they'd likely take an American name
from Charlie 'Yardbird' Parker, perhaps.

Pink Floyd took their name from 2 American musicians; the Rolling Stones from a Muddy Waters track, and so on.

British houses do have yards too, of course, but they are paved or concrete areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. Here's a theory: The yard is a length of measurement which was traditionally the length of
Edited on Mon Oct-18-10 01:03 PM by Liberal In Texas
the king's forearm or some such vague standard. In 1758 and again in 1760 an instrument maker, one Mr. Bird submitted a proposal to a House of Commons committee to standardize the yard measurement. Probably not where the music group got their name, but interesting. I also like muriel_volestrangler's explaination posted above.

A yard is also an enclosed area or a group of buildings. Like Scotland Yard.

Also a yard bird is a convict or an untrained army recruit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. "honor" killing ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigone382 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
35. Dowry death, more likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
22. In some of those cultures if the bride's family doesn't
meet the terms of the "bride price", the groom's family will kill the bride and setting her on fire is one of the ways they do it. Could this be one of those instances? I think the police need to investigate very thoroughly on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigone382 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. Correct, although "bride price" usually refers to money paid by the groom's family.
"dowry" refers to money paid by the bride's family to the groom. Dowry is supposed to act as a sort of ante-mortem inheritence for the daughters, who have no legal right in India to their family's wealth upon the death of the patriarch (though they can be written into a will, they usually are not). However, dowry rarely functions in this way; it is viewed as belonging to the groom's family. Even if the bride's family pay the agreed upon dowry, the groom and his family may later demand more money by harrassing and threatening the bride. If her family fails to deliver, she may be murdered so that the groom can marry again to collect another dowry.

Should the groom perish, the bride, who is forbidden to remarry, has virtually no guarantee that his family will continue to support her...especially if she does not produce a male heir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
23. This is just so sad...for whatever reason.
What a horrible end for that young woman....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lightningandsnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
36. This is horrific.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC