|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 09:12 PM Original message |
WSJ article.."Why Liberals Don't Get The Tea Party Movement"...we are poorly educated, 'baggers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WannaJumpMyScooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. because it is not a "movement" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 09:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Hot darn that's what I called it about two months ago....you are right on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Grown2Hate (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. Because we're not FUCKING BRAINLESS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. That was my first thought...this whole story must be a joke, but the WSJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vixengrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 09:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. WSJ is now FOX for elitists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vixengrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. There is, like, line-by-line bullshit I want to go over in that-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-18-10 04:36 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Actually, I always thought you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
handmade34 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
5. I think he makes a good argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. It's nonsense written by a hack from a right wing think tank. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
8. the Federalist Papers were propaganda written to appease Anti-Federalists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-17-10 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
10. Stop the world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC