Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Moscow, Idaho shooter...probably went off his medication as he did halt mental health counseling.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 06:31 PM
Original message
Moscow, Idaho shooter...probably went off his medication as he did halt mental health counseling.
Edited on Mon May-21-07 06:32 PM by liberalnurse
My scenario is unfolding:

http://www.newwest.net/index.php/city/article/shooting_... /

snip>


Shooting Wreaks Devastation in Moscow, Idaho


By Joan Opyr, 5-20-07


Update: At a press conference late this morning, Idaho authorities revealed that the shooter had in fact killed his wife before his rampage at the courthouse and the church, bringing the death toll to three.


The gunman, who killed himself, was identified as Jason Hamilton, 37, a maintenance worker with a long history of mental illness and domestic violence. His wife, 30-year-old Crystal Hamilton, was found dead in their home with a single gunshot wound to the head. Crystal Hamilton worked at the Latah County Courthouse, where her husband unleashed a barrage of semi-automatic weapons fire Saturday night, and Jason Hamilton had done cleaning work at the church where he killed the caretaker.

end>

Please note: long history of mental illness and domestic violence.

You will soon hear about his non compliance with medications...dellusional, paranoid thinking....rage/control issues.


Here is another report with lot's of information about Jason Hamilton.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/nation/4823476.h...

May 21, 2007, 5:54PM
Idaho shooter spoke of killing others


By NICHOLAS K. GERANIOS Associated Press Writer
© 2007 The Associated Press

snip>

MOSCOW, Idaho — A gunman suspected of killing three people and himself said during a court-ordered mental evaluation that if he committed suicide, he would try to take a large number of people with him, police said Monday.

Three months after that conversation, authorities say, Jason Hamilton shot and killed his wife at their home, then drove downtown with two assault rifles and fired a barrage of bullets into an emergency dispatch center inside a courthouse and a parking lot outside.


Hamilton had a history of violence, and a judge ordered him evaluated after he tried to kill himself in February by overdosing on anti-anxiety medication. Hamilton told a hospital worker that if he really wanted to commit suicide, he would do it through a mass shooting or bombing, Assistant Police Chief David Duke said.

Hamilton was judged not to need involuntary commitment and was released, Duke said.

Hamilton was arrested on a felony strangulation charge in September 2005 in a case involving a girlfriend he had while separated from his wife. Hamilton was convicted of misdemeanor domestic battery of the girlfriend, who survived, and was sentenced to 180 days in jail, with 90 days suspended, Duke said.

Hamilton was in court again last Tuesday for violating the conditions of his probation on the domestic violence conviction by halting his mental health counseling, but the case was delayed until next month, Duke said.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's great though
Edited on Mon May-21-07 07:17 PM by MichaelHarris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Or that it was decided there was no need to commit him
Edited on Mon May-21-07 07:18 PM by lizzy
even though he said that if he is going to kill himself, he will take a large number of people with him.
I mean, it's only reasonable to conclude he should be out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. we really
should have let him buy explosives and more guns. No reason NOT to deny him his God given right to have weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's also great he only got 180 days for domestic abuse case
Edited on Mon May-21-07 07:23 PM by lizzy
involving his girlfriend, with 90 days suspended. I mean, had he gotten a long sentence, he might have not been able to kill all these people. And who wants that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You're right
I mean it's just a woman he was trying to kill. They're a dime a dozen around here. 90 days for attempted murder of a woman? Seems about right for Idaho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Looks like he was legally barred from owning guns, since he had
a domestic violence conviction (never mind the mental health issues).

I don't think you'll get much argument from most of us regarding prohibiting gun ownership by criminals and the mentally incompetent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Why shouldn't these vulnerable people have guns to protect themselves?
Edited on Mon May-21-07 11:12 PM by billbuckhead
Besides who can determine who is a criminal and who is crazy? The real answer is to do what all the other advanced nations have done and make guns very hard to get for everybody. It's the only fair thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Ummm...Germany and the UK don't allow "equal access" to guns for the mentally incompetent...
so you can't argue that we should.

Nice red herring, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. In a de facto way they do by making guns hard to get for everybody
Will you call the victims families on behalf of gun "enthusiasts" and tell them that rifles are hardly ever used in crimes? I'm sure they will be comforted. BTW, rifles are used many more times in homicides than there are justifiable homicides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good find. Thanks. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Facts show govt. did not enforce 18 USC 311 as in many such tragic cases. The problem is not guns
but the failure of government to enforce existing laws.

Given that reoccurring situation, gun-grabbers in congress should aggressively push for enforcement of 18 USC 311 and 26 USC 5861 and stop trying to prevent law-abiding citizens from keeping and bearing arms to exercise their natural, inherent, inalienable right of self-defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. And their de facto right to kill anyone they want as easily as possible
Edited on Tue May-22-07 12:30 PM by billbuckhead
Other industrialized nation have multiples less of these incidents as gun promiscuous USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC