Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY man who ate 10 cans of tuna weekly sues Bumble Bee Tuna, Stop & Shop over mercury poisoning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 09:03 AM
Original message
NY man who ate 10 cans of tuna weekly sues Bumble Bee Tuna, Stop & Shop over mercury poisoning
White Plains, N.Y. — A suburban New York City man has filed a lawsuit that claims he got mercury poisoning from eating 10 cans of tuna a week.

Lee Porrazzo, of White Plains, filed the suit against Bumble Bee Foods. He’s asking for unspecified damages for breach of warranty and negligence. He also sued his local Stop & Shop supermarket for selling the tuna.

Porrazzo said he started eating the tuna in January 2006 because the seafood company called it “heart healthy.” The lawsuit says tests revealed he had a mercury level twice the normal amount.

A Bumble Bee spokesman told the New York Post it wasn’t aware of mercury toxicity from eating commercial seafood in the United States.
<snip>

http://www.penfieldpost.com/latestnews/x549837180/NY-man-sues-seafood-company-over-tuna
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. 10 cans a week for over 4 years.
Just the thought of eating that much tuna would make want to gag. I like tuna but that much and that often?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds kinda fishy to me.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. you would think that the spokesman would
know that tuna contains higher levels of mercury than most seafood. Doesn't matter if it's commercial or not.

idiots all the way around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is a blood mercury level of "twice the normal amount" considered medically dangerous?
Edited on Tue Oct-19-10 09:16 AM by slackmaster
"Generally recognized guidelines for blood levels of mercury have not been established. "

http://cfpub.epa.gov/eroe/index.cfm?fuseaction=detail.viewInd&lv=list.listByAlpha&r=188247&subtop=208

From QuackWatch:

Blood Testing

Mercury is excreted by the kidneys, which filter the blood. The mercury levels of blood are lower than those of urine and therefore more difficult to detect. For this reason, blood testing for mercury is not commonly done. Even at high levels of mercury exposure, industrial workers show blood concentrations in the parts-per-billion range, typically less than 5 parts per billion.
These are close to the limits of detection. In this range, the amounts are too small to identify the type of mercury or its source. Urine mercury testing gives a more meaningful picture of exposure and is also more accurate because the mercury is more concentrated.

http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Tests/mercurytests.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. His attorney advised against also seeking damages for "tuna breath"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Has there been an actual diagnosis of mercury poisoning?
This smells fishy - like someone who read a story about mercury levels in seafood and saw dollar signs. Hope he gets paid in albacore if he wins his junk lawsuit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. He would have to prove some sort of injury related to the mercury
level that he could not have gotten from another source--a lab result isn't enough, I would think. I think he intentionally ate the tuna, bided his time, launched a suit. Probably saved his grocery store receipts, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Pregnant women are told to stay away from tuna, swordfish
and any other big water fish because of mercury. So the stories are out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. That's because the fetus is very sensitive to low doses
A dose of mercury that would have no effect on an adult can have an enormous effect on the brain development of a fetus. That's also why pregnant women are warned against even handling certain types of medication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. "Twice the normal amount"! Yeah, that's going to sway a court.
Not. This guy may want to think twice about this effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. I thought it was pretty much common knowledge that you have to keep
big fish eating to under 12oz a week - tuna, salmon, mackerel, swordfish - whatever.

It's what the government recommends for pregnant women, to avoid risk to the fetus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. No harm to adults - we need not follow guidelines for fetal health if not pregnant. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Don't believe it. if it is harmful to a fetus, it is harmful (though considerably
less so) to an adult. We are the same biological entities.

That's why I keep it at no more than 3 cans of tuna a week, or 1 can of mackerel (salmon is way too expensive for my larder).

With both my parents having Alzheimers, I'm not taking any chances with poorly understood chemical and heavy metal contamination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC