Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Umm, Guess What??? That New, AWESOME Newsweek Poll... POLLED CELL PHONES

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:37 PM
Original message
Umm, Guess What??? That New, AWESOME Newsweek Poll... POLLED CELL PHONES
Edited on Fri Oct-22-10 08:37 PM by Beetwasher
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/10/22/poll-obama-approval-jumps-dems-more-fired-up.html

-snip--

This poll was conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International on October 20–21, 2010. Telephone interviews were conducted with a nationally representative sample of 1,005 adults, age 18 years and over, including 672 adults reached on a landline telephone and 333 adults reached on a cell phone. The overall margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3.8 percentage points for results based on 1,005 adults. Results based on smaller subgroups are subject to larger margins of sampling error. The margin of error is plus or minus 4.2 percentage points for results based on 848 registered voters and plus or minus 4.3 percentage points for results based on 773 likely voters. In addition to sampling error, the practical difficulties of conducting surveys can also introduce error or bias to poll results.

--snip--

Hmmmm. Imagine that. Decent sample size too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can live with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Woohoo!!!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. So does Gallup. And they have approval for Obama at 42 percent, with us losing 80+ seats.
Edited on Fri Oct-22-10 08:46 PM by BzaDem
As does Pew, which has us losing 40-60 seats. As do almost all live-interview pollsters, none of which has such good results.

Newsweek usually is more Democratic-leaning than other pollsters. They had Obama vs. McCain polls at one point where Obama was winning by something like 15 points. I don't think it's the cell phone issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Gallup and Pew poll people w/cell phones? Do you have a
link supporting that, because I have read otherwise. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Here are links for both.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/110383/does-gallup-call-cell-phones.aspx

"Gallup includes cell phones in each national Gallup poll. Gallup has been including cell phone-only households in all national telephone Gallup polls since January 2008. Further, cell phone-only households are now as likely to fall into national Gallup polls samples as those living in traditional landline households."

http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/666.pdf

"Results for this survey are based on telephone interviews conducted October 13-18, 2010 among a national sample of 2,251 adults 18 years of age or older living in the continental United States (1,487 respondents were interviewed on a landline telephone, and 764 were interviewed on a cell phone, including 311 who had no landline telephone)."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Thank you! I had read that the majority of cell phone
users weren't accessible for polls so I stand corrected, at least with these two orgs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. That used to be the case, babylonsister, but they're finally catching up. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Really?
Pray tell. Let's see proof of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Google is not that difficult to use. See post 9. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Then There Must Be Some Serious Discrepancies In The Likely Voter Screens
I wonder whose is closer to reality? Guess we'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Oh, I don't dispute that.
I'm just saying it has little to do with cell phones.

While Gallup is way off (I think and hope), Newsweek is likely off in the other direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I'm Not So Sure, Since There ARE Other Pollsters Who DON'T Poll Cells And They Help To Skew The
Edited on Fri Oct-22-10 09:09 PM by Beetwasher
Aggregates, or at least COULD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. That's generally because they're robopollsters, who aren't allowed to call cell phones.
Edited on Fri Oct-22-10 10:00 PM by BzaDem
Robopollsters like Rasmussen historically aren't that inaccurate. Rasmussen had Obama winning by 6, and he won by 7. Despite not calling a single cell phone. They might be off by a point or two, but they aren't usually off outside the margin of error (any more than cell phone pollsters are).

If you have unweighted samples, of course no cell phones will probably produce a bias (and probably a large one). But if you weight to take into account gender, race, etc, the difference becomes much less clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-10 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Yup and rasmussen floods the field with their bad polls skewing the aggregates
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-10 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. According To The Newsweek Poll The Democrats Are Actually In A Good Position To Pick Up Seats
They have a 48% -45% lead among voters for Democrats among likely voters.

Either Newsweek's credibility or the credibility of almost every independent polling organization is going to be in tatters after this election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. But the internals on the Gallup poll "likely voters" are BIZARRE.
For example, they have hispanic voters who went 2 to 1 for Obama, flipping to 50-something - 40 something -- with the Rethugs on top. Even with all the anti-immigration rhetoric of the Rethugs. That can't be accurate. Something's wrong with their "likely voter" sample.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. They didn't actually release the Hispanic subgroup. The author of the article you are talking about
Edited on Fri Oct-22-10 10:03 PM by BzaDem
computed an approximation of the Hispanic subgroup given other data.

The reason they don't release it is because subgroups have much smaller sample sizes, and the smaller the sample size goes, the more error you get. Most polls have some subgroups that are wildly divergent from reality, but their top line ends up being accurate.

(For example, if you were to take a 1000 LV sample, and then look at the subgroup of people with blue eyes and red hair, your margin of error on that subgroup will will be in high double digits, even though the margin of error on the whole sample is only around 3%.)

I think their likely voter methodology is underestimating turnout. But the small-sample Hispanic result you are talking about isn't the main reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Imagine that! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Um... You Forgot This Part...
NEWSWEEK Poll: Obama Approval Rating Jumps, Democrats Close ‘Enthusiasm Gap’

Sorry... was that too loud?

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, Can't Be Said Enough!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. LOL !!!
:thumbsup::thumbsup:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. HAH!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cilla4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. I noticed both as well,
bodes well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC