|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
unhappycamper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:09 AM Original message |
TSA to phase in new pat-down procedures at airports nationwide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
1. The TSA is distinctly un-American |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. I agree completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:43 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Are you suggesting no security at all? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:46 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. No, I'm suggesting a return to a real security model |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:58 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. What's a "real security model"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:01 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I defined the attributes above, and that goes for everything enacted since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:21 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. The problem is any type of security involving metal detectors and examined luggage... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 11:26 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. I understand the need for some type of security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piratefish08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:56 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. there is no more security now than before. it's an illusion. fear-mongering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. I agree, there really hasn't been many changes since 9/11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 04:33 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. A bit far? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
2. Screw bush and his fear mongering and BS useless invasive procedures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
3. Let me guess, "turn your head and cough"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voice for Peace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
4. Do you know if it's possible to opt out of the screening x-rays? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:31 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Did you alert the machine by the carry-on x-ray? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. RE: Nude-O-Scope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:55 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. And if you opt out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voice for Peace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 12:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. thanks so much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 12:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
25. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
7. I'm on between two and four flights each week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 09:47 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. In the 1960's, if you recall, anyone could walk onto the flight deck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:05 AM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Had to look up the definition of a Kettle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
17. Until a significant percentage of people stop flying over this travesty of security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
18. They feel under your boobs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 12:13 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. I'm sure every "Squeezy McFeelpants" TSA agent is literally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 10:15 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. You know, this system isn't going to work until you have them doing it to Hilary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
23. Wow, I'm feeling safer already! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-29-10 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
26. Kicking this - DUers should be bothered about these unconstitutional procedures. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC