Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Were "Three Strikes" Laws & the Like Enacted to Funnel Profits to Prison Privatizers?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 05:47 AM
Original message
Were "Three Strikes" Laws & the Like Enacted to Funnel Profits to Prison Privatizers?
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 05:52 AM by Hannah Bell
Surfing the net in search of a bit of trivia I ran across several pages touting prisons as a business opportunity & growth industry. Intrigued, I noticed:

1. There are 24 states (some sources say 28 or more) with "three strikes" laws. All but Texas wrote theirs between 1993 & 1996.

2. Corrections Corporation of America, the largest private prison operator, was founded in 1983. Wackenhut launched a subsidiary, GEO, in 1984 for the express purpose of managing prisons.

3. In 1990 there were just five privately run prisons. By 2000 there were more than 100, suggesting that the 90's were a huge growth era.

It seems fairly obvious that the "drug war" isn't about keeping drug use down -- it's become more widespread, & harder drugs more casually available, under the drug war (nixon to present). But it was a boon for police & prisons.

Is the whole "law & order" schtick a cover for private profit & rent-seeking?

Is "immigration reform" another boondoggle for prison operators? CCA's first contract was to run an immigration detention center.

More incarceration coming:

"Prison-policy experts expect inmate populations in 10 states to have increased by 25% or more between 2006 and 2011, according to a report by the nonprofit Pew Charitable Trusts.

Private prisons housed 7.4% of the country's 1.59 million incarcerated adults in federal and state prisons as of the middle of 2007, up from 1.57 million in 2006, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a crime-data-gathering arm of the U.S. Department of Justice."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122705334657739263.html

Between 1987 & 2001, the number of prisoners incarcerated nearly doubled, but the number of private prison beds grew 4000%.

http://www.privateprisonreform.com/privatization.html

"Trends in Corrections Privatization:

Private prisons enjoyed another banner year in 2007. All levels of government expanded their use of private correctional services, sustaining the trend of rapid growth in prison privatization. And there were signs of far more sweeping policies, as some officials began looking beyond contracts for individual prisons."

http://www.stonesoflaw.com/trends.html

http://www.correctionsprivatization.com/costs.html

http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=867

http://www.prop1.org/legal/prisons/970317itt.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think that is a very big possibility
rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Follow the money..
Always excellent advice in the land of the free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whyverne Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. They hate welfare but love prisons. Even though prison is much
more expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm reading Kind And Usual Punishment by Jessica Mitford this week.
Prison is a fucking racket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Convenient
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 07:12 AM by blindpig
Where does business as usual end and conspiracy begin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. yeah, that line is pretty blurry a lot of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. It would be interesting to track political donations from the privatized prison industry
to politicians supporting mandatory sentencing, three-strikes law and who adopt a "tough-on-crime" stance. I'd venture a guess that there is a very strong correlation.

Why are we paying judges if we prevent them from considering the unique circumstances of a crime when they impose sentencing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. of course they were.
In the name of "law and order" of course. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. You bet, and it's "worked great" too. We have more prisoners than anybody. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. it appears that everything in america is about profit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC