Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

11/01 Charnin Midterms Model: The Likely Voter Cutoff Model (LVCM)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:27 AM
Original message
11/01 Charnin Midterms Model: The Likely Voter Cutoff Model (LVCM)
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 10:28 AM by tiptoe


Richard Charnin’s 2010 Midterm House and Senate Forecast Models: RV/LV Polls and Election Fraud    bit.ly/adCbdW

11/01 Charnin Midterms Model: The Likely Voter Cutoff Model (LVCM)


Richard Charnin (TruthIsAll)         source: http://richardcharnin.com/2010ElectionForecastModels.htm

Nov 1, 2010

The Likely Voter Cutoff Model (LVCM)

Generic polling data shows that Democrats comprise 58% of registered 2-party voters who do not pass the LVCM screen.

In 2004, there were 22 million voters who did not vote in 2000. Nearly 60% of newly registered voters were Democrats for Kerry. In the 2006 midterms, a Democratic tsunami gave them control of both houses. In 2008, there were approximately 15 million new voters, of whom 70% voted for Obama. All pre-election polls interview registered voters. Likely Voter (LV) polls are a subset of the full Registered Voter (RV) sample. LV polls exclude most "new" registered voters–first-timers and others who did not vote in the prior election.

Most pollsters use the Likely Voter Cutoff Model (LVCM), a series of questions regarding past voting history, residential transience, intent to vote, etc. Since students, transients, low-income voters, immigrant new voters, etc. are much more likely to give "No" answers than established, wealthier, non-transient voters, Republicans are more likely to exceed the cutoff than Democrats. A respondent who indicates “yes” to four out of seven questions might be down-weighted to 50% compared to one who answers “yes” to all seven.       bit.ly/a8UYRb

The LVCM assigns a weight of zero to all respondents falling below the cutoff, eliminating them from the sample. But these potential voters have more than a zero probability of voting. The number of "Yes" answers required to qualify as a likely voter is set based on how the pollster wants the sample to turn out. The more Republicans the pollster wants in the sample, the more "Yes" answers are required. This serves to eliminate many Democrats and skews the sample to the GOP.

In 2010, Generic RV and LV polls project that approximately 70% of registered voters will vote.
Democrats comprise 58% of registered 2-party voters who do not pass the LVCM screen.


Table 1a
Registered vs Likely Voters

CNN/TIME
.96 correlation ratio between RV and LV margins
























18
Polls
Average
Wtd Avg
Win

AK
AR
CA
CO
CT

DE
FL
IL
KY
MO

NV
NY1
NY2
OH
PA

WA
WI
WV
RV Full Sample
Dem
46.5
49.4
10

41
22
56
47
56

61
31
42
46
39

43
60
67
43
45

48
45
45
Rep
41.3
40.4
6

53
36
37
44
37

32
42
38
46
50

32
33
39
49
45

44
48
38
Margin
5.2
8.9
4

(12)
(14)
19
3
19

29
(11)
4
0
(11)

11
27
28
(6)
0

4
(3)
7
 
LV subsample
Dem
44.6
46.8
7

23
41
52
44
54

57
32
43
42
40

40
55
57
40
44

51
44
44
Rep
45.7
45.3
10

37
55
43
49
44

38
46
42
49
53

42
41
41
55
49

43
52
44
Margin
(1.1)
1.5
(3)

(14)
(14)
9
(5)
10

19
(14)
1
(7)
(13)

(2)
14
16
(15)
(5)

8
(8)
0
 
50% of RV-LV
Dem
45.6
48.1
9

32.0
31.5
54.0
45.5
55.0

59.0
31.5
42.5
44.0
39.5

41.5
57.5
62.0
41.5
44.5

49.5
44.5
44.5
Rep
43.5
42.9
9

45.0
45.5
40.0
46.5
40.5

35.0
44.0
40.0
47.5
51.5

37.0
37.0
40.0
52.0
47.0

43.5
50.0
41.0
Margin
2.1
5.2
0

(13.0)
(14.0)
14.0
(1.0)
14.5

24.0
(12.5)
2.5
(3.5)
(12.0)

4.5
20.5
22.0
(10.5)
(2.5)

6.0
(5.5)
3.5
Prob
77%
97%


0%
0%
100%
36%
100%

100%
0%
84%
11%
0%

97%
100%
100%
0%
19%

98%
3%
91%

Table 7a
Likely Voter Cutoff Model

 
Registered Voters
 
"Likely Voters"
 

Pollster
Gallup
Pew Research
CNN/Opinion Research
ABC News/Wash Post
McClatchy/Marist
Newsweek
Associated Press/GfK
FOX News
Reuters/Ipsos

Total
Date
31-Oct
30-Oct
30-Oct
28-Oct
25-Oct
20-Oct
18-Oct
13-Oct
11-Oct


Sample
2027
2373
921
1015
807
848
1338
1200
854

11383
GOP %
48
43
49
45
41
42
46
41
46

44.7%
Dem %
44
44
43
49
47
48
47
39
44

44.7%
 
Sample
1539
1809
542
786
461
773
846
687
720

8163
GOP %
55
48
52
49
46
45
50
48
48

49.5%
Dem %
40
42
42
44
46
48
43
39
44

42.6%
 
Turnout
76%
76%
59%
77%
57%
91%
63%
57%
84%

71.7%
GOP %
31%
35%
50%
32%
42%
19%
42%
45%
44%

39.5%
Dem %
69%
65%
50%
68%
58%
81%
58%
55%
56%

60.5%


Table 7b
Democratic Projection Sensitivity
50% Dem UVA -- Voter Turnout and Share of RV Cutoff

RV&LV
 
Voter Turnout

 
 
Mix
85%
 
RV
100%
true

 
 
Democratic Share


Dem Share
of RV Cutoff
70%
60%
50%
46.60%
46.60%
46.60%
47.80%
47.60%
47.40%
49.00%
48.60%
48.30%

 
 
Democratic Seats




70%
60%
50%

204.3
204.3
204.3
209.5
208.8
208.0
214.8
213.3
211.8
 
Democratic Projection Sensitivity
60% Dem Shr RV Cutoff -- Voter Turnout & Dem Share of UVA

RV&LV
 
Voter Turnout

 
 
Mix
85%
 
RV
100%
true

 
 
Democratic Share


Dem Share
of UVA
75%
60%
50%
48.50%
47.40%
46.60%
49.80%
48.50%
47.60%
51.00%
49.60%
48.60%

 
 
Democratic Seats




75%
60%
50%

212.9
207.7
204.3
218.3
212.6
208.8
223.7
217.4
213.3

 

11/01 Charnin Midterms Model: Dems lead Generic RV polls (Pew, ABC, CBS, McClatchy, Newsweek, NBC)

A second Independent Confirmation of a Fraudulent 2004 recorded vote count

11/01 Charnin Midterms Model: Dems keep Senate 50-48 (53-45 before vote miscounts)

11/01 Charnin Midterms Model: The Fraud Component

11/01 Charnin Midterms Model: Undecided Voters, Turnout and Final Exit Polls
 

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another independent confirmation of a 2004 Election Fraudulent Vote Count:
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 09:28 PM by tiptoe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC