Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think there's a decent chance Obama is not going to run for a second term.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:33 PM
Original message
I think there's a decent chance Obama is not going to run for a second term.
I'm sure even uttering the uncertainty is likely to outrage more than a few folks but I'm not saying I wouldn't vote for him again. I would.

I have no idea how that would possibly work but it's not like there weren't enough trial balloons about Hillary Clinton taking Biden's spot in 2012. I've been politically aware since about the mid 80's so I'm still a very young pup compared to some of you who have been around much longer. You might have better feelers for this sort of thing, because it's certainly not something I'm used to.

I'm just not seeing the fight in him and more frequently than not I get the vibe he is operating from a "Plan B" fallback position which he didn't prepare for or (obviously) want to be in. And it's wearing on him and I'm not sure much will change that. He seems to indicate he gets charged up by mingling with real America, outside the DC bubble and he's also driven to action (his own words, to the Netroots Gathering earlier this year) by having his feet held to the fire. I don't think he's getting the things he needs or expected, maybe those things weren't even realistic to begin with.

I'm not absolving him of responsibility for his political decisions- they were, after all, his decisions- but the environment in DC is clearly fucking with him.

Back to that "Plan B" fallback position: The Republicans are going to enjoy eating him alive as he tries to negotiate with them. They will trash our government even further and Obama, as he mentions time and time again, will work to find common ground with them.

This sort of thing works when you're dealing with adults but for whatever reason he chooses to believe that somehow the Republicans give anything near as much of a shit about this country as the Democrats do.

That's not going to make the next two years any prettier for him or us.

So that's it. Throw acid in my face now. I'm not saying he shouldn't run or that I wouldn't vote for him if he does. I'm saying there's a chance he's not going to run for re-election and that somehow the party is going to work with that.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have a feeling you may be right...
No acid from me.

Perhaps he didn't expect just how hard it would be, governing this vast, unruly, restless nation. I thought he had a lot more fight in him...

I will certainly vote for him if he runs again. NO question there.

He needs to stop compromising with the Republicans, and fight them every step of the way. I just don't see that happening.

It's too bad, really...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh shit. Can we just stop this already? He's still the most popular politician - by far.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 01:40 PM by Dawgs
He was humbled last night and today. That doesn't mean he doesn't have the fight in him. Anyone would act like he did.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. Thanks! Of course what we do and how much we HAVE HIS BACK might matter nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
64. LBJ was quite popular as well
LBJ also accomplished major Reforms in Health care and Civil Rights yet he quit..It was just too much for him and the same very well could be the case fro Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. LBJ was also older and had a long history of severe health problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. If only I could unrec a thread 100 times
we need to be able to start counting them again.

There is no reason for him not to run in 2012, his popularity is hovering around 50% after two years in one of the deepest recessions short of 1929. He's going to be just fine pulling a Clinton and painting the new puke congress as a bunch of obstructionist assholes that have no ideas to put on the table.

People in this country are sick to death of Congress and their inability to do anything productive and are showing that disgust by voting out incumbents. I'll put money on the same thing happening in two years, if the jobs picture improves noticeably, and it better, I'll put money on the Democrats taking back Congress in two years.

I won't throw acid in your face but I will laugh in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Man up, Poll_Blind
The 2012 campaign has already started and Obama's the candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. If he steps aside, it's conceding defeat...
If he opted not to run again, it would telegraph to the public that Democratic policies and ideals are a failure. I don't think any Democratic candidate could overcome that and win in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Too bad we can only unrec once. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Seems pretty unlikely. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hope springs eternal
I predict many a post to come on DU, I daresay typed with one hand in many cases, making this same prediction.

Julie

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. I disagree.
He is going to run for a second term. He is going to be the Democratic nominee. And he is going to win the general election.

I think the mistake many people on DU make is that because they "don't see the fight in him" they assume he isn't fighting. His approach is "never let them see you sweat." He sees the path he needs to take to win, and he takes it. That's how he won the 2008 primaries. That's how he won the 2008 general election. That's how he passed health care.

It might not be very satisfying to watch as a hard-core partisan. But it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Sorry, Skinner, but I disagree with you.
Obama has capitulated and compromised with the Republicans too many times. On removing the public option, and on DADT, to name just a couple.

How can you call this working? I wanted him to put up a real, visible fight against the Republicans. He didn't. Maybe I'm wrong, but his actions strike me as weak.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. It worked in the campaign because he was always out in public
inviting the voters to be on his side and promising to be on theirs. It looked like a partnership.

Then he gets to Washington and that partnership disappears for two years. The grassroots campaign turns into a top down White House that doesn't find a way to continue its conversation with millions of supporters. If he doesn't seem to sweat, now that looks like a lack of interest.

Obama may well run and win in 2012 but it will be with a fraction of the support his team has wasted, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. 200,000 people went to see him in the last 2 mos.
I hate to break this to you, but we are further left than most people. Even Jon Stewart called for compromise and although he claims to be a moderate, he clearly is liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Oh, I know we're more left than most.
Everybody should be over here with us, dammit!

OK, I'm exaggerating. I'd go see him too, if I had the chance. That does NOT mean I approve of how he's governing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. These crowds were clearly supporters. Watch the videos and tell us they dont approve overall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
53. A fight would have greatly energized the base and perhaps increased the turnout in the midterms.
Everyone likes to see a visual display of someone going to bat for another. What the electorate saw was silent compromise. People will always support someone who they perceive is fighting for them, and conversely, if they don't they stay at home. When a leader gives-in to the very people who are trying to hurt Americans and our country and then not getting a single vote in return doesn't inspire others to continue to support that person. Those kind of actions rip the heart out of the millions of people who worked tirelessly to get their leaders elected only to see them turn their backs on you. It's not complicated, but for some unknown reason democratic leadership failed to see the ramifications of their actions. For voters to remain loyal to an officeholder, officeholders need to remain loyal to the people who put them in office. Yesterday we saw what happens when leaders thought more about appeasing the republican enemy than doing what was right for the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #53
65. You have said it so much more clearly than I could.
This is exactly right.

Thank you, my dear AnArmyVeteran.

I salute you!

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
62. You don't have to apologize to Skinner for disagreeing with him.
He is the admin of DU, and he does a great job in that role for which everyone thanks him, but he is not God, our ideological leader, or anyone who needs to be apologized to for disagreeing with.

Not trying to single you out, but it just strikes me funny when I see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
75. The Kennedy bill had a public option
It wasn't Republicans that decided to trash that and force a nine month health care fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
78. delete wrong place
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 09:51 PM by onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. It doesn't work when it's beyond the realm of campaigning
Respectfully said, of course. "Never let them see you sweat" must be another name for "Capitulate at every opportunity".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
72. "It might not be very satisfying to watch as a hard-core partisan. But it works"
Didn't we just have an election where it emphatically did NOT work? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
73. Didn't he do it without negative attack ads?
Seems to me that's what got most of us to really hate those ads! I know here in CA it was part of what gave NutMeg the slip... she was vile!

His hair isn't on fire, so he doesn't care. He's not raving, spitting, crying, and turning colors like John Boehner, so he doesn't care. He's not yelling! Clearly he doesn't care!

Yep. Lot of that going around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. I believe that he'll be running again
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 01:46 PM by eleny
It's disappointing that he's not showing the passion we know he has.

Today, he doesn't seem to realize that part of his job is bucking up the troops. There are Dems all over the country who took a kick in the teeth yesterday in their states. I think we needed him to come out strong and help people to find confidence for the future in his own sense of confidence.

But I do think he still has personal ambition and a sense of duty to his Party and will run. And regardless of what happened yesterday, I think he'll win reelection. Obama does very well on the stump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think there's a decent chance that this is the stupidest thread ever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RickFromMN Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hope you're correct

I vote in the primaries. I won't vote for Obama in the 2012 Democratic Presidential Primary.

I hope we get a better Presidential candidate in the primary.

What will I do if President Obama is our standard bearer in the 2012 general election?

I will hold my nose and vote for him. I am, first, a Democrat.

I won't be voting for him because I have enthusiasm for him.
I will vote for him because I will view him as the lesser of two evils.

Does that mean I think President Obama will win re-election? No, I do not.
President Obama won't be able to fire people up a second time. The enthusiasm will be gone.

If President Obama runs, again, in 2012, I believe he will be our standard bearer.
I believe he will not be re-elected President in 2012.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Welcome to DU.
Even if you are 100% wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Rrrrrrright. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Unrec'd
This is too dumb for words.

Quit with the "fight" crap - it makes you look like a school kid. The man is President, not a prize fighter.

Such an inadequate metaphor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. Difficult to imagine
Even if he was not thrilled with how the job turned out, it is difficult to see him (or anybody) just walking away. To do so would require a huge amount of something: nerve, ego, zen??

That said, it will be interesting to see how he handles the next few months as that will be telling. We will see if he has a second-term in him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. And what viable replacement do we have who wouldn't be similarly eaten alive?
Face it, ANY DEM is going to be the target of the right-wing/corporate media slime machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. not even.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. No reason for Obama to concede defeat and not run in 2012
Lawrence O'Donnell commented last night that Obama remains incredibly popular, and challenged the other hosts for names of someone who can beat him in 2012.

Palin would be DOA, and it might be a replay of Coons/O'Donnell race--although that Tea Hag does scare me.

Mitt Romney's name popped up as a possible, but the Tea Baggers would never stand for him.

Chris Christie was suggested, I think by Eugene Robinson, and O'Donnell said if you offer up a guy who's just taken office a year before, then yer done.

For Obama, I don't see anything remotely close to Viet Nam that led to LBJ not seeking re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. The only prediction I'll make about Obama ...

is that when he leaves office six years from now, his hair will be all white.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
43. The Presidency does age them fast, doesn't it?
I'm thinking his hair will be all white before 2016...at the rate it is going gray now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
57. HA, that office has gotten everyone else and it will take it's toll on
him too. man I don't know why everyone is tripping, this is not that big of a problem, bush survived 9/11 and katrina, lied his way into a war, and screwed up the other one. all obama has to do is defend the policies that have been passed, whatever the repugs can do to water down obamacare, hell let them. the next time dems have the house they can pass laws to push it back in the right direction.

all president obama has to do is jobs, jobs, jobs. keep the time table for pulling out of afghanistan, that will help a lot. push for across the board cuts, but protect the cores, the next dem house can turn right around and fix anything the repugs mess with. then all dems have to do is keep the white house, and get a few wins here and there and all of this will just be something for the history books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
End Of The Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. Statistically not very likely. Rarely happens.
Obama will learn a few things from this, and adjust accordingly. I think his inexperience has cost him, but he's smart and he won't make some of the same mistakes again. I expect his next two years to be stronger and more charismatic than the first two.

He'll run again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
45. If he moves right his "adjustment" will be fatal. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
End Of The Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. Totally agree with that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. Its a possibility
It depends on how he does in the next two years and what happens to his popularity. If his popularity plummets to Cheney like levels because the economy continues to stagnate, then I think there is a chance he will step aside in view of the strong likelihood of not winning re-election.

If he actually puts it together in the next two years, becomes a strong president, and the economy gets better than he will run for re-election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. YOU WISH (clearly).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndrewP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. I'm fairly certain he'll run again n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. Unrec. I'm sick of all the anti-Obama, anti-Dem shit here today. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Yeah, the truth hurts when it is laid bare for all to see
Especially after last night. Sacrificing 2010 for his reelection in 2012 was a stunningly brilliant move, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. You need a lot more tinfoil and a class in logic. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. Several months ago I wondered if democrats would be deliberately throwing the midterms.
Democrats had an arsenal of weapons they could have used, but instead they choose the equivalent of a BB gun. I thought of the political ramifications of deliberately losing the midterms. By giving republicans the house or senate then democrats could blame the opposition for any and all problems in 2012. But as long as democrats held both branches of government they would continue to be blamed and have a much worse chance of retaining the presidency.

If democrats were even mediocre at messaging they could have savagely attacked republicans for their congressional obstructionism. But democrats seem incapable of crafting a simple, coherent message. Even the dolt-Bush was able to keep his messages extremely simple so even the dumbest person could understand. He was able to take us to unnecessary wars, gut regulations, increase the deficit & debt, and destroy the economy.

But democrats don't seem to be capable of keeping messages simple and communicating with the American people. If they could they could have educated the American people about what they did and are planning to do. But the handwriting was on the wall during the health care reform debates a year ago. The lowly tea baggers had complete command of the national dialogue for six months before a word was said by President Obama. By then, all of the hysterical fear mongering had taken root and the democrats were on the run.

Democratic leaders need to take classes in 'communications 101' if they ever want to win an election again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Check this out.
It's a long article, but well worth reading. It goes over why Organizing for America was being pushed as the way to win in 2010 but when push came to shove, most felt like it was just a way to get the President elected in 2012 at the expense of the 2010 elections.


http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/10/the_dncs_risky.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Good read... Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. That's it, buddy. I'm calling total bullshit on all your anti-Obama rants today.
Obama went to townhalls all across this nation, facing teabaggers who brought GUNS with them. And you have the fucking NERVE to call the man a coward over and over today and now you're saying he didn't say a WORD during that time.

That is fucking bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Yeah, he said a lot and went to a lot of townhalls
But when it came to present Hope, Change, and everything else that he ran on in 2008 and turn it into meaningful action, he took a pass and rolled over for the GOP in some crazy notion that they would work with him. It didn't work and it won't this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. Wow, a little too literal there aren't ya?
"Hope" and "Change" is his platform, you know the policy initiatives that he proposed and professed during the campaign? Those things have been conveniently abandoned in favor of bowing to Republicans, again, in hopes of appeasing them and playing nice. Sure was a winning strategy this time wasn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #46
82. Link about appeasement... If a person does not know his enemy he's sure to lose to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
27. There is not a chance of that happening. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
29. His reelection campaign is already forming. He is running.
He will win the nomination with no primary fight.

Seriously, this shit is getting old. It was old back in 2009.

I'm just not seeing the fight in him ... I don't think he's getting the things he needs or expected

Bullshit. Then you've been covering your eyes and ears, because he's been fighting more than ever. And there is a whole litany of accomplishments, a slew of things that he got done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erose999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Is Tim Kaine in charge? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. Obama is in charge.
Who will be running Feingold's or Grayson's or Kucinich's campaigns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. I agree with the OP but looks like most can't accept this idea.
It seems like Obama hasn't wanted to fight/lead for a long time now. Compromising isn't 'leading', especially when it's hurting Americans and damaging our country. Republicans have demonstrated they would rather destroy the country and harm every American if they could profit politically. Obama seems to have rose colored glasses on because he seems incapable of understanding how truly dangerous right wingers are. 

Every republican leader said they will not compromise with democrats or the president at all. But during today's press conference Obama never mentioned that. Why not? If the leaders of the opposition party openly say they refuse to compromise and want to destroy you, why wouldn't a normal person use a national press conference to condemn republican leaders and say that was exactly the reason why our country was almost destroyed under Bush and why republicans want to continue to destroy any chances of making our country better now? The elections weren't necessarily a referendum on what Obama has done, but rather on what he hasn't done mostly because of republican obstructionism. 

The primary reason for lack of improvements in our country is because republicans have voted against everything that could have helped our country. And they also have publicly stated they wanted to destroy the president. I dont get it when Obama says republicans love this country like everyone else when they have been doing everything they can to destroy it. 

If Obama doesn't understand the levels of evil his opponents will go for purely political gain then it's time to start thinking about another democratic presidential candidate who IS capable of seeing how truly evil republican leadership has become. We need a leader who is capable and strong enough to go up against the republicans. Obama is obviously not strong enough to fight for us. He believes compromise is the only way of governing, even when compromising hurts our country and the American people. 

No one can defeat an enemy until they understand just how deadly that enemy can be. We have seen how republicans will do anything to gain control of our government. They are void of any ability to care about the millions of Americans they hurt. All they care about us winning and to hell with the damage they do to our country and our people. 

Obama still believes he can make a pact with the devil through compromise and talking nice. To me that is out of touch and it certainly isn't leadership. 

It's time we start looking for another democratic presidential challenger to run in the 2012 election. Someone with the courage, strength and intelligence to actually lead our country. Someone with enough guts to go up against the thugs on the right. To do what is right often requires confrontation, not constant compromise. Obama has demonstrated he is not capable of confronting those who seek to destroy our country. 

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #30
80. Most people at DU can see a ridiculous "idea" when it's offered up.
Shocking!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
34. If he doesn't run, he should go all in now. But from his press conference, he's running again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
37. He'll run in 2012, unless his poll numbers are below 35%.
Ironically, his worst decisions were likely the result of his doing what he thinks is best for 2012, not 2010. He badly misjudged the economy and did almost nothing to actually create jobs. He played ball with the bankers, with Wall Street, with the Defense industry, with the Health Care Industry. He went along with them over and over. He mortgaged his future with them.

When he didn't deliver on his promise of hope and change, the Democratic party elected officials paid the price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
50. ROFLMAO
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
51. Joe Biden: "I will be Obama's running mate in 2012."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
54. Big unrec
People sure have super-high expectations for what this President needs to accomplish and ridiculously low expectations for how he does or should respond.

I only wish we had commentary from the 1994 "Republican Revolution" as a comparison point, so we could see if Bill Clinton got comparable treatment for losing BOTH the House and Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
56. TBTH, if I were him, I'd say "F'd this, I am out of here."
F this crap. If the GOP wants to burn down this democracy, then go ahead. Just do this without him.

I cannot say I blame him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
58. Then why in hell does he think he needs to reach across the aisle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
59. He is still popular outside the South.
it is the Southern racist bigots that are dragging his numbers down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
60. Well, that would make things easier.
I won't have to be flamed into ash for supporting a primary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
61. he'd be best to put one term in, some americans do not
appreciate something good that comes along. this comment is not meant for DU'ers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
63. There are plenty of signals he will run in 2012 - including asking Bien to run with him again
Obama is clearly working hard every day to try to get closer to the things he wants done. There are no hints that he simply wants to quit.

That you ignore Obama's actions, yet give credence to rumors - possibly generated by some Clinton obsessed people - that have been denied - strains credibility. As to what you are likely implying - Hillary will run, why do you think she would run better against an actual opponent than the President. Being President is an enormous advantage in running - why do you think that a non-incumbent would do better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
66. I think you may be right.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 04:58 PM by mmonk
I think my race in America (white) overall is very racist and why probably all the lies and hate speech worked so well in making them go off the deep end as time passed. After all, the way he governed which in my estimation given the economic circumstances was very center to center right, but they firmly believed he was a socialist. To be that delusional takes a certain amount of irrationality I think may be attributable to racist tendencies or thought. There is no way to govern a people with those attitudes while they are being backed by a political party that pushes it for all the mileage they can get. Until something is done about the corporate media who lie forcefully or boldly such as Fox, or subtle like the rest of the corporate media by staying silent on critical issues of our time to their false equivalencies by those that speak the truth to the liars at Fox and in Congress. Right now, I see NO positives in this country at all and feel completely separated from these people as if to be a different species of life on earth. Anyway, those are my thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
67. Yes, just because he's not a raving loon, he's going to quit.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Obama is about the only sane politician left...
And I think Americans will see this in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. That's one reason I like him.
Always calm under pressure. Unfortunately, some people see that as apathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KatyaR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
70. Me, too, sadly.
Who knows what Congress will throw at him in the next year? I'll be surprised if impeachment isn't the first thing thrown on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
74. I think there is a chance I could be a billionaire tomorrow..but I wouldn't bet much on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
76. in no mood for this particular brand of tripe. unrec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
77. Outrage? Try laughter!!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
79. I'm frequently amazed by how little some folks on a political board seem to know about politics
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 09:53 PM by onenote
Is there a "chance" he's won't run? I suppose one answer is that there is a chance of almost anything. But based on what we know now, is there any reason to think he won't be running? Absolutely not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
81. Obama is a very ambitious professional politician
Ambitious politicians don't voluntarily decline to run for reelection.

He will run and he will win. The economy will be humming along by then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC