Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PALIN as Speaker of the House... ??!?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:49 PM
Original message
PALIN as Speaker of the House... ??!?
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 01:52 PM by OneTenthofOnePercent
I'd like to see that for the pure outrage, hilarity, and exploding heads.
It'd be a f'ing circus. :rofl:

Technically, ANYONE can be voted Speaker of the House.
It does not have to be an elected member of the House of Representatives.
Although I do not believe such an individual would be allowed to participate in voting.

---------------------
Edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glen123098 Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. you have to get elected first. then the hilarity begins
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. No you don't
They could give it to me and I'd be Speaker if I had the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Where did you learn about that?
And btw - good grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. There is no requirement in the Constitution that the speaker must also be a current member of the...
... House of Representatives to serve as speaker. In practice though, every speaker elected HAS been an elected representative. Basically, it's not against the rules/requirements of the position... but highly unlikely.
If you are aware of any such requirement to hold the position of Speaker, let me know, but I think I might be right, here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I asked because I didn't know even though I had civics classes ages ago
So this was new news to me. Thanks for your reply.

Even the probability of her being in that position gives me chills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Palin winners 27 LOSERS 33
The knives will be out for her, she cost them the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. She'd get bored and quit in less than a week. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. First, she would have to learn to speak...
English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Constitutional clause in question is rather vague.
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A1Sec2

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

I read that as implying, though not directly stating, that the Speaker, along with the other officers, shall be a member of the House. But do we really want that to go to the Extreme Court? :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I honestly see no implicatations anywhere.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 02:34 PM by OneTenthofOnePercent
It would be incredibaly easy to word the clause such that the HoR must choose one of their peers... but it is not mentioned anywhere. Whether the HoR chooses an elected official or outsider, all conditions of the clause are met. Therefore either course of action presents no constitutional violation. Without any clear violation of constitutional law... I'm not even sure such a case would make it to SCOTUS.

I actually think it would be a pretty savvy move to elect a non-representative Speaker into a HoR that is almost equally divided. This means ALL of the majority party members can be expected to vote without breaking decorum and the Speaker can focus 100% on leading the Majority Party. If the non-representative Speaker had prior Congressional experience... it would make even more sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC