Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheer up! This was the DLC's greatest election showing EVER

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:19 PM
Original message
Cheer up! This was the DLC's greatest election showing EVER
Just think - in all previous six Congressional elections in which the DLC/third-way crowd ran our Party, we emerged holding neither house of Congress. After yesterday, we still have a tenuous hold on the Senate.

Bravo! Their batting average went from .000 to .071.

(Dr Dean's batting average is 1.000)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm surprised you admire Dr. Dean's electotral strategy so much. After all, the people elected in
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 10:21 PM by BzaDem
his "50 state strategy" were primarily conservative Democrats who opposed things like the public option. If that's a 1.000 batting average to you, I'm completely at a loss as to your methods of measurement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Stop spreading that untruth. Dean did NOT let the DNC get involved
in picking candidates. It was Rahm and Chuck who handpicked the conservadems.

It is simply not true that Dean's 50 state plan should be blamed. They picked the candidates, not Dean. In fact when Dean refused to give the DSCC and DCCC more money for campaigns, said the state parties needed it.....they verbally attacked him. Rahm even used the FU term.

I get tired of people repeating that meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well, that is what they're here to do. Spread disinformation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. + 1 --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. +10
Don't blame Dean for what that asshole Rahm did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. +100 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. +100x Infinity! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Well, there are only a limited number of sources for this meme on DU.
We know who they are and their message is consistent.

The systematic crippling of the Democratic Party marches on as a vital step toward neo-feudalism.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. I wish we could recommend individual posts
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. It was DLC/Rahm who pushed those conservative Dems into candidacy ...
and who hatched all those little "Blue eggs" -- NOT Howard Dean --

and often Rahm was pushing conservative Dems even against more liberal Dem

incumbents!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. We'd have held a lot more of them
if Dean had been around to help with policy and messaging. Not all of them, but a good number. We probably would have a much better health plan, one we could be proud to trumpet instead of this better-than-nothing message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dean was handed an unusually Democrat friendly environment
But, let's do as we usually do and Monday Night Quarterback - facts be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Do you recall the attack on Howard Dean from within the Dem Party ... ???
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 11:06 PM by defendandprotect
By DLC .... Rahm/Gibbs ...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Yep. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. You would know all about the philosophy of "facts be damned"
It should be your sig line!
Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timbuk3 Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Election Factoids
I thought I’d drop these facts here before they disappear down the memory hole and the MSM starts lying about “what this elections means”.

Blue Dog coalition lost 18 of 34 seats. New Democrat coalition (third wayers) lost 15 of 45 seats. Progressive caucus lost 3 of 72 seats.

Eighty-eight percent of voters cited unemployment and the economy as their number one concern.

So…

“Repeal and replace healthcare” is not why the GOP won seats, and when they say it is they’re lying.

The GOP won 33 seats in the house by defeating “conservative” Democrats in “red” districts. This is more than half of their gains. Without those seats the house would be 218 “D” and 206 “R” with the called elections as of today, and 218 is enough for the majority.

In complete alignment with previous mid-term elections, younger voters turned out at only 2/3 the rate they did in 2008. Meanwhile, the seniors turned out just like they always do. These same seniors, who appeared in droves at Glenn Beck’s Tent Revival and Hover-round demonstration on their medicare-paid Hover-rounds, also oppose “Obamacare” by roughly 6 in 10.

So…

Those who are already receiving social security and medicare demonstrated that they don’t care if you don’t get it, too.

The bottom line is, progressives in blue states DID show up. Heck, in DE we flipped the House seat from “red” to “blue”. The problem is, regressives in red states showed up, too. And since they’ve already got theirs, they don’t care if there’s nothing left for you. So they elected stains on humanity like Rand Paul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. Actually, the blue dogs who rode into elected office in 2006
Edited on Thu Nov-04-10 01:52 PM by ProSense
got crushed yesterday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC