Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So ..... will Speaker Boner sell that big jet they whined about when Pelosi flew home on it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:45 PM
Original message
So ..... will Speaker Boner sell that big jet they whined about when Pelosi flew home on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. He should... he can drive to Ohio. Get him a nice clunker and let him go. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. he'll be running golf junkets out of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't it standard for the speaker to get a plane?
I thought the Air Force suggested upgrading her because of the distance...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The OP was sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yeshuah Ben Joseph Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. He should be able to get by with a smaller plane.
Ohio's a short flight from DC. The whole purpose of the big plane for Pelosi was so she could get home without refueling, for security reasons. It was the Chimp/Chertoff Homeland Security department who made that rule, and unlike most of the crap they came up with, it actually made some sense (at least to those who are paranoid about that kind of thing.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I'd like to suggest the same kind of plane used by Senator Paul Wellstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Wellstone used a King Air
And the military has lots of King Airs...they are called the C-12 in military service. But you rarely ever see a Congressman/woman, Senator or even their staff aboard a C-12...those are viewed as worthy of only carrying low-level military leaders, like Colonels and 2-3 star generals/admirals.

I flew for an agency called JOSAC (Joint Operational Support Airlift Command), and their job was basically the US government's VIP transport, other than the 89th Airlift Wing (which owns AF1, and the other smaller aircraft like the C-32, C-40, C-37 and C-20). The 89th AW, in addition to flying the President, also flies members of the Cabinet, Congress, Senate and senior DoD leaders and the staff of those aforementioned people.

Occassionally if the 89th's aircraft were in high demand, some members of Congress or other US government officials would "get stuck" having to fly on a JOSAC asset. JOSAC primarily schedules the military's other (smaller) VIP aircraft, like the C-21 (what I flew), the C-12 and the UC-35. These are typically small 8-10 passenger business aircraft, either jet or turboprop. JOSAC also scheduled missions for a few other aircraft like the AF Reserve's fleet of C-40s (Boeing 737s) and the Navy's C-9s (Douglas DC-9 airliners) that are primarily used to shuttle personnel around.

From my own experience, when we'd roll up in our C-21 (Learjet 35) to pick up Congressional staffers or even members of Congress/Senate themselves, we were met with derision and the all-to-common attitude of "why did I get stuck with this small jet".

Range is rarely an issue unless you're going overseas. There's no excuse to say " I need to avoid stopping for fuel because of security" within the United States, because there are military airfields within easy reach to refuel at that are quite secure. It comes down to ego (ie, I don't want the small airplane) and convenience (ie, I don't want to spend an hour on the ground while the jet refuels). That's the only reason why anyone would care whether they got a C-20 or a C-32.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. That whole story had some half-truths on both sides...
The C-37 (Gulfstream V) can easily fly coast to coast...it's got the range of the C-32 and then some...and it's much smaller (a little larger than the C-20s that Pelosi's office claimed couldn't make the flight). As for not stopping for security reasons, that's a crock because there are many USAF installations across the country they can stop at to get gas (ie, McConnell AFB, Offutt AFB, etc).

I used to fly VIP flights aboard the C-21, which is the very small cousin to the C-20s (Gulfstream III and IV), C-37s (Gulfstream V) and the C-32 (Boeing 757, airplane in question). We often flew DoD brass and members of Congress (and their staff), and we'd stop at military bases to refuel. Security was never a concern. However, I did often hear our elected officials and their staff complain about the size of the airplane (the C-21 is a Learjet 35) and they did not like having to "waste" an hour on the ground to refuel. So the "it won't get to our destination" and the "security concerns" are basically politicians coming up with excuses to get a bigger airplane...and make no mistake, in those circles the size of your airplane seems to be important...hence why the C-37 (Gulfstream V), with range equal to or greater than the C-32 (Boeing 757), wasn't even mentioned as an option because if the Speaker was only worried about range and not size, that airplane would make more sense (and cost far less).

If you ask me, it's a free fucking ride on a corporate jet. Enjoy it rather than bitch about it...you could be stuck in the middle seat on a Southwest 737 and change airplanes in Houston.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. I heard he's already having a tanning booth installed in it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fuck no, he'll have it re-fitted with a wet bar and a big ass ashtray.
All for the better execution of the people's business, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Will he re-name it The Orange Blossom Special?
Whiskey Train?

Snoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. As long as it has a bar, he's good to go!...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. The C-32 isn't just used for that purpose
It's primarily the overseas hauler when government leaders other than the President fly abroad. That's the primary reason those aircraft were bought. It also routinely serves as Air Force 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. send out a tweet....he only needs Hastert's old plane...not the 757.
Edited on Thu Nov-04-10 07:18 PM by Historic NY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. None of them, Dem or GOP, need a 757 to fly in the United States
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. I hate the idea of seeing orange man
Speaker of the House, I am going to be doing this :puke: such bs putting these asses in charge again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stagecoach Donating Member (468 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Of course
We'll probably hear nothing about it from the media. I'm afraid these next 2 years Boehner amd his ilk will have the attitude towards the electorate of "You gave us ours, screw you now....until election season 2012, that is". Any of these new congressmen that go to Washington think they're going to shake DC up, they're crazy. Once they see how the GOP's game is played, they'll be right in bed with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC