Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NBC was OK with Tim Russert being obviously biased in favor of Dubya

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:06 PM
Original message
NBC was OK with Tim Russert being obviously biased in favor of Dubya
Edited on Fri Nov-05-10 08:07 PM by kath
during the 2000 election and recount. Plus there was Jack Welch's BLATANT favoring of Bush.

Russert had a tight relationship with Bush's opposition research team in 2000, and would frequently call them saying "what have you got?" so that he could broadcast anti-Gore crap. This was in Time mag: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,59665,00.html

In fact, the film reveals how much the media has come to depend on the "Oppo" research for material. Traditionally, newspaper journalists and TV producers have conducted independent research of charges made by a campaign. That has now dwindled, both due to news organizations being more and more stretched and because the media believes that the backfire effect on the campaigns would be far too devastating if the information provided were wrong.

In the film we see RNC glee as the Associated Press accepts their oppo research on a Gore misstatement during the first presidential debate. During their months of filming BBC producers also observed producers for NBC's Tim Russert, among others, calling to enquire if the team had any new material. This was apparently normal practice.

"It's an amazing thing," says RNC researcher Griffin in the film, "when you have top-line producers and reporters calling you and saying 'We trust you.... We need your stuff.'"



Read more: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,59665,00.html#ixzz14SUCcS00


I think this was also mentioned in one of Greg Palast's books (? "Best Democracy Money Can Buy" perhaps, but don't have that book here at the moment)

Russert also showed Bush that he wore a Bush campaign pin under his lapel:
Reliable sources have informed MWO that Jack Welch and Tim Russert attended last autumn's Al Smith Dinner in New York together - and that Russert, on the back of his lapel, was cleverly wearing a Bush for President button.

Russert has reportedly tried to shrug off the incident in private, but has failed to discuss it publicly.

MWO has also been told that either during or after the campaign, Republican Welch chewed out his employee, NBC News correspondent Claire Shipman, for being too favorable to Gore in her reporting on the Vice President's campaign. And Shipman's bureau chief - Tim Russert - reportedly did not lift a finger to protect her or to protest Welch's outrageous partisan interference.
http://rogerailes.blogspot.com/2004_05_23_rogerailes_archive.html


Another source on this:
During the 2000 presidential campaign, Russert established a link between Meet The Press and the G.O.P. opposition research team that was responsible for digging up dirt/manufacturing dirt on Al Gore. On election night, after conferring with Welch, Russert demanded that Gore quit the race before the legally mandated recount took place in Florida. The next morning, on the Today Show, he repeated the demand. During the recount, Russert actively campaigned for Bush, going so far as to insist that Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Lieberman endorse the counting of illegally cast military ballots that would benefit George W.

There have been reports from those who were present that journalist Tim Russert was wearing a Bush For President lapel pin when he attended the traditional Al Smith Dinner in New York shortly before the election. This should be interpreted as less of an endorsement than a brownnosing. Russert was accompanied by Welch, who was a strong supporter of Bush and completely intolerant of dissent on the matter.

http://makethemaccountable.com/podvin/media/020109_Russert.htm


Gore actually witnessed the episode. On this, and more about Russert and the 2000 election, see the journal of EXCELLENT DUer "Time for change":
Russert’s role in the 2000 election

Confirmation of Russert’s political leanings (not that any is needed) come from an incident related by Al Gore to Anthony Lappe, which took place shortly before the 2000 election at the Al Smith dinner, attended by Gore and Bush. Here is Lappe’s description from his book:

"At one point in the evening, Gore explains, Russert approached the candidates. As Gore was closest to him, Russert respectfully shook his hand and then moved on to Bush. Thinking that Gore had turned away, Russert shook Bush’s hand and, mischievously, turned over his jacket lapel to reveal a Bush campaign pin hidden under the fold."

Russert was indeed relentless on Bush’s behalf during the Florida recount. Prior to Bush’s being awarded the presidency, as described by Eric Alterman in “What Liberal Media?”, Russert referred to Bush’s “future presidency” nineteen times, and he referred to Bush himself as “President Elect Bush”. On NBC Nightly News on November 8th, Russert said that Gore “can’t extend it too long, nor can he become a whiner about Florida”. He asked Dick Cheney if he thought that Gore was being a “sore loser”. And when Bush’s Florida campaign chairman, Katherine Harris, announced George Bush as the winner of the Florida election, based on the fact that the uncounted ballots hadn’t been counted by what she interpreted as the deadline date, Russert announced on his November 26th edition of Meet the Press, “He (Bush) has now been declared the official winner of the Florida election … and therefore is the forty-third president of the United States.”

And he tried, ultimately successfully, to get Gore’s running mate, Joe Lieberman to make concessions. {more}

MORE in this excellent journal: http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Time%20for%20change/31



DOUBLE STANDARD much?? Oh, wait -- IOKIYAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mike Nelson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. In this country...
you should only secretly give money to Republicans, apparently. The activist conservative Supreme Court agrees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. The "advantage" of Russert's passing is that his successor, David Gregory
is quite open about his preference for Republicans. There is no more hiding their pro-GOP/Corporate bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Olberman's contract is what nailed him.
It's a crappy deal, but a contract is a contract.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Do you have a copy of his contract?
I'm sure everyone would like to peruse it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. MSNBC referred to it when they made the announcement.
I still think the whole thing stinks to high heaven.

And, no, I do not have a copy of it.

But there haven't been any denials of it as of yet.

My employees sign NDAs and if I get word that any of them are talking about our business, there will be trouble.

A lot of folks are pretty zealous when it comes to protecting their Brand.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samplegirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Office politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. If elected Democrats were smart, they'd use this as a catalyst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick for the daytime crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC