Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Van Hollen RESIGNS as DCCC chair...Thank the Gods!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:43 PM
Original message
Chris Van Hollen RESIGNS as DCCC chair...Thank the Gods!
Edited on Fri Nov-05-10 08:45 PM by Ken Burch
Who do YOU think should succeed him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why? Is he the one who wants Pelosi's job? Is that why he resigned?? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No...he resigned because he was the one responsible for saving our House majority
Edited on Fri Nov-05-10 08:46 PM by Ken Burch
And we all saw how well THAT worked out.

There was no excuse for us losing 60 seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Chris Van Hollen was instrumental in the Dem election
sweep in 2008. He is definitely not right wing and he is definitely not anti-feminist. I helped him win his first election when he defeated a very popular Republican who had been in office a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. He's anti-choice.
that's clearly an anti-woman position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. No, he's not. Quit making up bullshit.
Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007)
Voted YES on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. (Oct 2003)
Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record. (Dec 2003)
Emergency contraception for rape victims at all hospitals. (Sep 2006)
Rated 0% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-choice stance. (Dec 2006)
Provide emergency contraception at military facilities. (Apr 2007)
Ensure access to and funding for contraception. (Feb 2007)
Focus on preventing pregnancy, plus emergency contraception. (Jan 2009)

http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Chris_Van_Hollen.htm

That's about as accurate a statement as blaming the loss of the House on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I think one of the reasons Dems lost
is that the Repubs were successful with their lies with both Repubs and Dems. For example, a DUer is saying that Chris Van Hollen is anti-feminist even though your list of votes show that he is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. If he wasn't, I stand corrected.
I'd repeatedly heard he was.

I also ask the mods to delete my posts on that specific point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. And unfortunately, a lot of DUers buy it too.
Van Hollen is anti-woman. Obama is an appeaser. Pelosi is incompetent. Having the House was worthless. That's just the crap I've heard in the last 24 hours. They live in a bubble of ignorance, either accidental or willful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yeshuah Ben Joseph Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. You're welcome!
Dad and I really had nothing to do with his resignation, but we'll take the credit, if it gets REAL Democrats in charge of the DCCC and DSCC again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks for YOUR post.
Edited on Fri Nov-05-10 08:49 PM by Ken Burch
Now, don't YOU have some bread and fish to deliver?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. RLOL!!!!!!
DUUZYYYY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Chris Van Hollen
is very liberal.

You are not likely to find a politician more liberal than he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. If van Hollen is so liberal why wouldn't he pledge to not cut social security? And why won't the
DLC publish the names of their members? They used to. Me thinks van Hollen is just another DLCer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Did you read the post by the Wraith?
No wonder the Dems lost 60 seats if DUers think the way you do. Blaming a good liberal like Chris Van Hollen is negative thinking. It doesn't win Dems a single vote, but it plays into Karl Rove's hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Anthony Wiener?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That could work.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nice
I hadn't heard about this. I dont hate the guy, but he failed at his job and I am glad that he had the good grace to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why? Van Hollen was great at the DCCC. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. A 60 seat loss is NOT great.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Most of that is not Van Hollen's fault, nor under his control.
Let's face reality here. Many of those seats lost were won in 2008 in very conservative districts. Add to that the tens of millions of dollars poured in from corporatist interests!

You still haven't convinced me. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Alan Grayson! oh wait.... Weiner would probably be the next best thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Is there a rule that the post has to be filled by a SITTING member of Congress?
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. No one who is DLC or "New Dem" .... nor anti-Choice .... !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trocadero Donating Member (892 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. AS WELL HE SHOULD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
23. Chris Van Hollen is staunch liberal of an upscale sort, but also a bagman & was elected as such
Edited on Sat Nov-06-10 01:30 AM by Leopolds Ghost
Not to take individual stands... He stands where his party stands (or more precisely, the Progressive caucus) on every issue. So if the Progressive caucus folds on an issue he folds. He basically ran for office on the platform of being the Democratic Party's future leader before he won his house seat. That's why they picked MD-8 to run in. He's dedicated to grinding out numbers and "winning votes", like Pelosi. Like any good bagman, like Rahm used to be, his primary concern is to keep Dems in office. He's the sort of leader where they say "This is your big test. We're running you for office. We want you to move to Kensington. If you can defeat what's-her-name" (the RINO that used to govern MD-8, one of the most liberal House seats in the country) "we'll give you a leadership position".

But he is pretty liberal compared to his colleagues and certainly compared to Rahm. Anyoe they replaced him with would be less liberal than Chris. Isn't he the Progressive Caucus chair/whip?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
25. Query, is there any Democrat in any position of leadership who is
liked or respected by the generality of DemocraticUnderground?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
26. Chris is angling for a Senate seat
once Sen. Barbara Mikulski retires, IMHO. Even though he is quite liberal, he seems to avoid controversy whenever possible.

I volunteered in his first campaign for Maryland's 8th District seat in Congress. In a remarkable upset, he defeated a well-liked moderate Republican, Connie Morella, who had held the seat for many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC