Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon Finally Bans Interrogations by Private Contractors…Sort Of

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 10:44 AM
Original message
Pentagon Finally Bans Interrogations by Private Contractors…Sort Of
Pentagon Finally Bans Interrogations by Private Contractors…Sort Of

Following the controversies surrounding detainee interrogations during the Bush administration, the Department of Defense has issued new regulations formally banning the use of private contractors to grill suspected terrorists held by the U.S. military.

The new rules do include some important exceptions, however.

The Secretary of Defense would be allowed to waive the prohibition temporarily for the sake of national security. Also, the Pentagon will still be able to hire private firms to assist in interrogations as linguists, interpreters, report writers and IT specialists, and they may continue to be involved as trainers and “advisors.”

The new rules were instituted after employees of CACI International and L-3 Communications (formerly Titan Corp.) were accused of torturing detainees at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and, in fact, were successfully sued in U.S. court by Iraqi detainees.

http://www.allgov.com/Controversies/ViewNews/Pentagon_Finally_Bans_Interrogations_by_Private_Contractors__Sort_Of_101108
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Loopholes big enough to make these guidelines useless.
Any situation in which they feel they need to torture someone could be, by definition, a matter of national security.

Almost anyone they feel the need to torture is likely to be a non-english speaker. So an interpreter or linguist could be present.

Trainer and advisor are so broadly and vaguely applicable that they can use these any time and every time they want to torture someone.

So these guidelines basically say that they won't use private contractors, except whenever they want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. bureaucractic mumbo jumbo that changes nothing.
Once you introduce the vague "national security" clause, you negate anything else. As well, the 'assist' clause leaves the window wide open for abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Where does the "ban" part come in?
The Secretary of Defense would be allowed to waive the prohibition temporarily for the sake of national security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wasn't it trainers and “advisors.” doing the deed at GitMO? How about Bahrain?
Bureaucratic BS and Orwellian rules to allow them to do exactly what they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Goes along with New Order, Same Abuses as outlined
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC