Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SMOKING GUN Cheney Handwritten Note (Pic): This Pres asked [Libby] To Stick His Head in Meatgrinder

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 06:59 PM
Original message
SMOKING GUN Cheney Handwritten Note (Pic): This Pres asked [Libby] To Stick His Head in Meatgrinder
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 07:04 PM by Dems Will Win


Fitz is building a case against Bush. This is big news and we need to get this into the echo chamber in the blogosphere!

Cheney's Handwritten Notes Implicate Bush in Plame Affair
By Jason Leopold and Marc Ash
t r u t h o u t

Wednesday 31 January 2007

Copies of handwritten notes by Vice President Dick Cheney, introduced at trial by defense attorneys for former White House staffer I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, would appear to implicate George W. Bush in the Plame CIA Leak case.

Bush has long maintained that he was unaware of attacks by any member of his administration against Wilson. The ex-envoy's stinging rebukes of the administration's use of pre-war Iraq intelligence led Libby and other White House officials to leak Wilson's wife's covert CIA status to reporters in July 2003 in an act of retaliation.

But Cheney's notes, which were introduced into evidence Tuesday during Libby's perjury and obstruction-of-justice trial, call into question the truthfulness of President Bush's vehement denials about his prior knowledge of the attacks against Wilson. The revelation that Bush may have known all along that there was an effort by members of his office to discredit the former ambassador begs the question: Was the president also aware that senior members of his administration compromised Valerie Plame's undercover role with the CIA?

Further, the highly explicit nature of Cheney's comments not only hints at a rift between Cheney and Bush over what Cheney felt was the scapegoating of Libby, but also raises serious questions about potentially criminal actions by Bush. If Bush did indeed play an active role in encouraging Libby to take the fall to protect Karl Rove, as Libby's lawyers articulated in their opening statements, then that could be viewed as criminal involvement by Bush.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/013107Z.shtml



Let's remember the President lawyered up in June 2004. THis is obviously why and it explains why Cheney and Bush are feuding a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wonder if Congress notices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It will be part of the Fitzgerald Report to Congress when his investigation is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, I know.
Just being rhetorical (with a little sarcasm and cynicism thrown in).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who in the White house, didn't commit a crime?
Bush then committed a crime...I wonder if Bush promised Libby a pardon, either reneging that promise, or is unable to do it, for fear of shedding light on his own crime.


Mom's voice comes to me..."OH WHAT TANGLED WEBS YOU WEAVE"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Very interesting!
K&R

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. There will be about a bazillion responses to this thread about Jason Leopold
I really hope he's right on this one...it supports what he said earlier about Cheney.

What a fascinating and scary time it is to be alive....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. KICK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. VP lawyered up in 2004 too.
Cheney was interviewed by the FBI surrounding the leak in 2004. According to the New York Times, Cheney was asked whether he knew of any concerted effort by White House aides to name Ms. Wilson.

Sources close to the investigation have also confirmed that special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is trying to determine Vice President Cheney's role in the outing of Mrs. Wilson, more specifically, if Cheney ordered the leak.

Those close to Fitzgerald say they have yet to uncover any evidence that suggests Cheney ordered the leak or played a role in the outing of Mrs. Wilson. Still, the sources said they are investigating claims that Cheney may have been involved based on his attendance at meetings of the Iraq group. Previous reports indicate Cheney was intimately involved with the framing of the Iraq war.

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Cheneys_role_in_outing_of_CIA_1012.html

One of the charges Libby was indicted on is lying to federal investigators. Perhaps Bush and Cheney did the same?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. hey robertpaulson, what do you think of AQ Kahn being mentioned
in the trial today?
Per larisa http://www.atlargely.com/2007/01/aq_kahn_and_the.html and http://www.atlargely.com/2007/01/aq_khan_and_the.html#more

image (3rd bullet point from the bottom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Very very interesting.
Also, I wish I knew what was blacked out at the top on Iran. Especially since that was what Valerie Plame was focused on:

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2005/Outed_CIA_officer_was_working_on_0213.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Can I take a stab at that question?
A.Q. Khan is at the center of the CIA's CPD work during the Clinton Administration. The CIA was able to guage the development of the nuclear programs of at least 5 countries -- North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Libya and Pakistan -- by tracking the international trade in the specialized parts for Khan's P-1 and P-2 gas centrifuges. In March 2002, the Bush State Dept. "outed" Khan over its trade with North Korea. That effectively ended CPDs work in the other countries.

The Bush Administration promptly used the information CPD had gained to press the case for war against four of these five countries. Iraq was invaded on faulty information about aluminum tubes and Niger Yellowcake - both related to Khan -- the P-2 device peddled by Khan uses aluminum tubes. Khan had also tried to buy yellowcake from Niger, a little-known fact is that Ambassador Wilson had travelled to Niger in 1999 to check that out for the CIA.

The outing of Khan was spectacularly counter-productive. North Korea kicked out the UN inspectors and repossed their plutonium stocks, and built a bomb (albeit, one that didn't work very well). Iraq had no real nuclear program, except a few bits and pieces bought from Khan. Iran dispersed and redoubled its program (from 1995-2002, it had bought 500 P-1s and an unknown number of P-2s from Khan). Libya - well, that was the sole success, they gave up their program. Pakistan placed Khan under house arrest, and continues to build up its nuclear weapons inventory.

Do you see why Bush might be interested in Khan related to Plame?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. We now know, Cheney DID order the leak. Wonder what Dick said to Fitz?
I have the feeling that he lied to investigators along with his assistant. They likely discussed with each other exactly what they would say to Fitz and the FBI. I'm sure Fitz will ask Cheney and Libby whether they discussed this.

Wouldn't be too surprised if the Veep is soon facing conspiracy and OOJ indictments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. No doubt about it. He scratched out "the Pres." on that note.
Cheney is a frikking idiot. Even I would have enough sense to tear up the note and start another one.

Notice the wide space between "the Pres." and the word "that." Cheney was thinking of how to rephrase what he originally intended to write. JMHO. YMMV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ebayfool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Or as OldLeftieLawyer put it ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. Who are all the people referred to in this note?
If I'm reading it correctly:

"Not going to protect one staffer (who?)

and sacrifice the guy the pres asked to stick his neck in the meat grinder (Libby)

because of the incompetence of others (who are they?)

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC