Lets be real, raising retirement age is the same as raising taxes.

It's a time tax only it's hitting regular people and not the wealthy who have paid less for 30 years putting us into this mess and handing the burden off to everyone who can't afford it. Time = Money, just ask any Lawyer and numerous other occupations that charge for time. Most people VALUE time more than money so by taxing peoples time we are taxing them in the worst way.

Say no to Republicans idea to tax our time.

On Edit: originalpckelly made the point below that making people work years longer also means they will pay more in taxes as they are working years longer. So it's also causing older people to have to pay more taxes not just putting in more time. A double whammy!

Stealing by the wealthy from the poor and middle class.

but we should want people to retire so that someone else can take their job. One of the reasons unemployment is high is because older workers HAVE to continue working...longer and/or go BACK to work after they'd retired!!!

Sheesh!

No way around it, you will end up paying more in taxes. Meanwhile, some rich dickhead who makes most of their income off of capital gains won't have to pay ANY payroll taxes, and they won't have to worry about it. This is why Warren Buffett pays less in taxes (percentage of income-wise) than his secretary.

aimed specifically at those between 67 and 69 years old, only.

What we need now is more jobs, not less.

Can you imagine walking into an HR office at age 67 and applying for a job?
It's f#cking ridiculous.
Most companies view anyone over 50 as a dinosaur.
And now we're supposed to be looking for a job in our late 60s?

What are people supposed to live on from their layoff at age 55 until retirement at age 70?

:shrug:

A mechanic or construction worker's productive years are shorter than a lawyer or stockbroker's.

Obviously demographics that tend to have shorter lifespans, ceteris paribus, get less out of SS for what they put in. Not saying we should change the eligibility age based on gender and race, but it's a necessary component of an age based system like SS. Fwiw, I can retire (full) at 55 so I feel for people who have to wait until 67. That's a long time.

comedian George Wallace had a poignant joke on this matter.

He said "The life expectancy for a black male in America is 64 years. Now why in the hell am I paying Social Security?"

That puts it nice and succinctly.

I sure hope Democrats are ready to do the right thing about this. They are in the majority and need to slap down these idiotic proposals right now.

which highlights how callous the idea is. Consider those whose jobs are manual labor, factoring in that the human body starts breaking down after the age of 50.

Can you imagine lifting heavy objects, doing construction work, etc., until the age of 70? If senior citizens are no longer able to perform the work, would they be able to walk (or wheel their wheelchair) into an employment office & get a job that would pay a living wage? Would they get hired at all?

might never get that is also subject to income taxes you pay today. :shrug: