Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Veterans Exposed to Carcinogen Shed Light on Secret Iraq KBR Contracting Deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 08:02 AM
Original message
Veterans Exposed to Carcinogen Shed Light on Secret Iraq KBR Contracting Deal
I know Veterans Day was yesterday(sarcasm ..slightly).Another example of the privatization of war.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/09/10/veterans-exposed-to-carcinogen-shed-light-on-secret-iraq-kbr-contracting-deal/

A lawsuit filed by Iraq war veterans against a former Halliburton subsidiary over exposure to toxic chemicals is not the first of its kind, but it has brought new insight into the Iraq war by revealing that a contractor with close ties to the Bush administration was quietly granted legal immunity while securing oil supplies in Iraq.

Former Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) failed to notify US National Guardsmen that were exposed to a highly toxic and cancer-causing chemical while providing security for the firm early in the Iraq war. The guardsmen got sick, and thanks to a classified agreement, US taxpayers could pay the legal bills for the latest in a string of lawsuits against the massive military contractor.

snip

recent probe by Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Oregon) revealed that KBR’s contract for the Restore Iraq Oil initiative included the only indemnity provisions provided to a military contractor in Iraq since 2001. Indemnity is a kind of legal immunity similar to an insurance policy, and in this case, makes the government responsible for paying for claims involving bodily injury or death resulting from KBR’s efforts to restore the flow of oil in Iraq.

snip

Papak also found that KBR was contractually required to report and evaluate environmental hazards and “to take all necessary precautions to safeguard personnel who might potentially be exposed to environmental hazards at work sites, including the wearing of protective gear and/or the closing down of operations at any unsafe site.”

KBR continues to deny this obligation.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. The RIO contracts were incredibly corrupt: KBR was allowed to renew this sole-source contract as
long as Iraqi oil production did not exceed the 2.5 million barrels/day output at the time the war started. That level was already depressed. In effect, the whole thing was a major scam by the multinational oil companies and other producing states, such as Saudi Arabia, to insure that world production stayed artificially depressed and crude oil prices high. 2009 production was 2.4 bbls/day - my, my, what a surprise.

That, my friends, was the top agenda item discussed at Cheney's secret energy summit, and the major reason we invaded and destroyed Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Too damn bad. Sneer." xVP Dickie 'Five-Military-Deferments' Cheney (R - War Profiteer)
Edited on Fri Nov-12-10 08:21 AM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC