Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Darpa: Now We Know Why Our Mach-20 Ship Crashed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 08:54 AM
Original message
Darpa: Now We Know Why Our Mach-20 Ship Crashed



Darpa: Now We Know Why Our Mach-20 Ship Crashed
By David Axe
November 16, 2010

It took six months, but the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency finally has a handle on what caused its hypersonic weapon prototype to “terminate” itself over the Pacific Ocean back in April. The findings have paved the way for a fresh round of tests for the Mach-20 flier, potentially leading to a new class of superfast weapons.

The Hypersonic Test Vehicle 2 — a 12-foot, 2,000-pound wedge packing a three-stage Minotaur booster — launched without incident from California on April 22. It climbed to the edge of space for a planned 30-minute, 4,000-mile jaunt toward Kwajalein in the middle of the Pacific.

But nine minutes into the flight, controllers on the ground lost contact with the HTV-2. The culprit, according to Darpa’s Engineering Review Board? “Higher-than-predicted yaw, which coupled into roll, thus exceeding the available control capability at the time of the anomaly.”

~snip~

Time was, Pentagon planners anticipated adapting HTV into a weapon capable of striking any target in the world within minutes of launch from a base in the United States. With that ambition running afoul of (very sensible) diplomatic concerns, planners instead envisioned using hypersonic technology in a new, superfast bomber.

Now it’s clear the Pentagon wants a less-ambitious bomber similar to models already in service. So instead, HTV-2 and its ilk are likely to lead to a new generation of missiles that can be carried by today’s manned planes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. How sad that we are evil enough to dream up a weapon such as this
but too stupid to build it so it works.

The "warmaking and dong-waving" aspect of human nature seems to have gotten totally out of control while the rest of us were watching Netflix or Ellen or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It Makes A Lot of People Rich...
...and creates lot of jobs as part of the Military/Industrial complex welfare system. Even a failure makes someone money in having to replace parts and waste even more money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. True. And what congresscritter wouldn't want a plant in his district
with hundreds of jobs building "test models" forever into the future.

Depressing, is what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. "warmaking and dong-waving"
You mean they pick up Dong-Ho and wave him around?




:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. And this is going to defeat terrrorism, right? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well, sure. You aim one of them thangs at the explosive in
somebody's underpants, and that guy ain't going to blow up nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. heh. heh. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Burnett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. They've been testing HTVs since the 60's.
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 10:28 AM by Billy Burnett
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC