Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democratic House Leader: Democratic Party "responded like Herbert Hoover" to unemployment crisis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 12:31 PM
Original message
Democratic House Leader: Democratic Party "responded like Herbert Hoover" to unemployment crisis
"We had a Roosevelt moment and responded like Herbert Hoover"



Dem leader: Party 'responded like Hoover' to unemployment crisis
By Jordan Fabian
November 16, 2010

The Democratic Party's Herbert Hoover-like response to high unemployment cost them their majority, a member of the House Democratic leadership team said Tuesday.

Rep. John Larson (Conn.), the House Democratic Caucus chairman who is expected to keep his position in a vote on Wednesday, said that his party did not do enough in the eyes of voters to help bring down the nation's 9.6 percent unemployment rate.

"We never did enough in terms of that area for us to have the kind of success we would have," he said on MSNBC. "We had a Roosevelt moment and responded like Hoover."

Larson's comments are a stinging assessment of his party's efforts to help create jobs during the 111th Congress. Voters, who swept Democrats out of power in the House two weeks ago, consistently named the economy and jobs as the top two issues during the midterm campaign.

Read the full article at:

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/129365-dem-leader-party-responded-like-hoover-to-unemployment-crisis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Were any of these voices screaming at the President when something could have been done??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually many in the House were indeed doing just that
It is the Senate where all "good" legislation goes to die..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonfli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's not too late to pass some good legislation during lame duck. Keep shouting!
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 12:49 PM by leveymg
Put some fire and smoke under the rest of the leadership's asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Most went along with the "puny" stimulus plan. They let three Senate Republicans write the bill.
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 01:04 PM by Better Believe It

And they wrote it and weakened it considerable so that it would fail to jump start the economy and pull us out of the recession.

When the Senate stimulus proposal went to House/Senate conference, the House leadership caved-in and agreed to every proposal made by the three Senate Republicans who wrote the bill.

You say, a bill had to be approved by at least two Senate Republican otherwise the Republicans might have engaged in a pretend "procedural" filibuster!

That the rational, actually excuse, given for surrendering to Republican demands in the unending quest for peace, love and bi-partisanship with Republican obstructionists.

And look at what that policy of capitulation and "outreach" to Republicans on the economy accomplished.

A Republican election victory, the growth of the right-wing "tea party" faction, an austerity plan that will pass Congress and mass joblessness.

Chess anyone?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Then I guess the REAL question is "Why the hell didn't the President listen to them?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He did. But President Obama preferred the tune his Wall Street/corporate advisors sang .....

and the proposals advocated by "blue dog, centrist" Democrats and a few Republican Senate "moderates".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreamnightwind Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC