Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the incentive here to privatize the TSA?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:08 PM
Original message
What is the incentive here to privatize the TSA?
What, exactly, is the advantage to having the TSA privatized? The only thing that comes to mind is that the TSA just recently went into major overload harassing everyone, children, women and men. Lots of the stories we're hearing are coming from anglo-Americans. Is it possible that Republicans are stepping in at a critical juncture, promising to be more efficient with these searches when they really mean that they'll be more "selective" by harassing mostly dark-skinned flyers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Republicans want everything privatized and no oversight. It's their M.O.
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 06:11 PM by Poll_Blind
It's the quickest way to destroy the way our society functions, maybe I should be a little more specific, to recast society in the image that they'd like it to be in.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They want a tiered system, don't they?
Where the well-connected get certain privileges, and everyone else gets treated like a chattering mass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. The well-connected already get privileges. They fly on corporate or
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 09:11 PM by LibDemAlways
private jets and circumvent the TSA all together. Those who do find themselves on a commercial flight are not necessarily subjected to the same crap as the rest of us peons. You think they'd x-ray or feel up Old Lady Barbara Bush if she was flying commercially? Not in a million years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Watching the jackboot TSA develop into the monster that it is
Maybe we should let the Repukes dismantle it, it's what they do best.

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Would you really trust a private corporation more than a government agency?
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 06:55 PM by The Backlash Cometh
Wouldn't one of them be mandated by federal rules, and the other by state rules? I don't trust this state for nothing, not even in the election of Presidents, or in the protection of my property. Why would I trust them with my body?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. I say, dial it back to pre-9/11
and then it doesn't matter who it is who is doing the groping.

Sorry, but the difference between being violated by a private contractor and by a TSA government employee is about the same as the difference between being harangued by a collection agency and being hounded by the IRS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. You can shame the IRS quicker than you can shame a private collection agency.
At least, in my State.

The State regulators are non-existent in Florida. This is a Libertarian State. They just don't publish that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I'd be interested in knowing your techniques for this
And I used to be enrolled to practice before the IRS, once had an auditor visibly shaking during an audit of my client. But it doesn't happen often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Simple - the equipment is already paid for (by the taxpayers, that is) . . .
So, finagle the contract with your buddies in Congress/Transportation/Homeland Security, pay the help $8.00/hour and just watch the money roll in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. I dont know why any private company would want the TSA
As a government agency they have some protection against lawsuits, but a private company would be subject to one civil litigation after another for violating passenger's rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. No, they'll just lean on Congress to change the laws and limit or eliminate their liability
And if Congress won't help them with that, then the Supremes surely will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. One reason for 9.11 is that it was privately run
But the other is union busting... Simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. that is bullshit, 9/11 happened for one reason only.
9/11 happened because the default response to a hijacking was to comply with the hijackers and fly the shitheads to Havana or Lebanon or wherever they wanted to go and then go home.

The hijackers actually flying the planes themselves into buildings was a new twist on the theme.

Every attempted attack since then was not thwarted by new security measures or passenger harassment - but by passengers on the plane subduing the aspiring terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. And they managed to go through security
since the airlines refused to put in the equipment and procedures that was STANDARD everywhere else. due to COST.

Republicans want to go back to that state since it DOES cost the Airlines to fund this show.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Nobody was looking for X-Acto knifes, with any technology
I think letting airlines secure their own fucking planes is a great idea, 9/11 happened because for thirty years cooperating with hijackers had been official policy everywhere, that will never happen again anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Oh yes they were
here is a story, real... actually two... that might tell you how wrong you are.

Story number one, we took a patient to Lindberg Field from one of the Cancer Clinics in Tijuana... so I go though the Magnetometer, which of course beeped, steel toe shoes. I am forced to leave behind my boots, but carried onto the aircraft my rescue knife with a six inch blade and my trauma shears.

Medical Emergency at the Tijuana Airport...

I am NOT allowed to carry any of my equipment, which is carried by a member of the security team. I leave behind at the checkpoint my Radio, and of course that same rescue knife...

Now I am not going to to into why they kept the radio, which came back when we came out, or why they carried my equipment and hovered over us like hawks since we were IN THE STERILE area of the airport.

Just because US Airport Security was a joke before 9.11 does it mean it was a joke everywhere else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. The incentive to privatize ANYTHING is to remove any trace of democracy.
Corporations are not democratic and no one expects them to be, so...

Take all important public functions and give them to private companies.

After that, let the public vote any way they want; it won't make the slightest difference.

And we won't have the slightest say in how our country really runs.

That's the main point.

(Of course, there's also money to be made)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. So they can hire pedophiles who can then legally grope teenage girls. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yay...then they can charge passengers a 50 dollar fee for groping them.
Sounds great :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Wouldn't that basically be reverse prostitution?
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. They'll probably just call it a "handling fee"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. And then charge ten times that to not be groped
Because you know that a private corporation will set up a system for well heeled people to pay for "pre-screening" so they can avoid the security systems. After all, profit is the ultimate goal, not security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. And, even after all that....
the NEXT guys will just happen to get on the next plane with the next box cutters...the next time it happens to be convenient for those in power to have something like that happen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Or instead of using commercial flights, use private planes
Since 9/11, TWO private planes have been flown into buildings ** while NOT ONE commercial plane has - but there are no additional security requirements for private planes or small airstrips. There is nothing to stop "terrorists" from filling a small to medium size private plane with explosives and flying that to where they want to create an event.

In addition, screening of packages is haphazard at best and many unscreened packages are flown on commercial flights. In fact, it is interesting that the "toner" explosive packages came out just before the "enhanced" passenger screenings started up.

** January, 2002: Tampa, Florida, teenager flies plane into building, committing suicide.
February, 2010: Texas, nutjob flies plane into IRS office, killing himself and one other person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. MONEY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. union busting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Dark skinned people have been getting this same treatment since 9/11
But now that everyone is getting the same treatment it has become a travesty.

Quick, hide the white women.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. It was a scam from the start..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. It was privatized. It was nationalized because of lack of standards
poor quality, cost cutting incentives etc.

The incentive to re-privatize it is a huge fucking boondoggle of cash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. and the TSA today is a goldmine of professionalism and ISO worthy best practices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. nope but that is irrelevant to "why privatize'.
The reason to privatize is the usual gang to get another huge cash cow torrent from the treasury directed their way. Same as why privatize prisons, or military services. The corruption of creating a permanent crisis and then turning that crisis into an endless revenue stream is 'why'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Actually it is FAR BETTER than it was
with all it's issues.

And lord knows I am a critic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC