Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House bill would give DHS authority over private sector networks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 11:43 AM
Original message
House bill would give DHS authority over private sector networks
By Gautham Nagesh - 11/18/10 02:12 AM ET

A new bill unveiled Wednesday by House Homeland Security chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) would give the Department of Homeland Security the authority to enforce federal cybersecurity standards on private sector companies deemed critical to national security.

The Homeland Security Cyber and Physical Infrastructure Protection Act of 2010 authorizes DHS to establish and enforce risk and performance-based cybersecurity standards on federal agencies and private sector companies consider part of the country's critical infrastructure. Such firms include utilities, communications providers and financial institutions.

The legislation is co-sponsored by Reps. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) and Yvette Clark (D-N.Y.). It will also create a new Cybersecurity Compliance Division within DHS that would make sure organizations comply with the new security regulations. The lawmakers argue DHS has not had sufficient authority or resources to fulfill its mission as the lead federal agency for cyversecurity.

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/129879-house-bill-would-give-dhs-authority-over-private-sector-networks


Maybe I haven't had enough coffee yet, but why does this sound like fascism from the left? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Way past time
for this, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. I agree it does sound like fascism.
Sickening that is coming from our side.

I don't have much respect for Harman. Why should she be in charge of this when she had her own security breech with Israel?
What a joke. Foxes in charge of the hen house once more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. This gets DHS into territory that has previously been reserved to NSA
Doubles the opportunity for mischief, such as off-the-books information sharing agreements with certain "friendly" foreign powers. No, Jane, no. You're enough of a security risk as it is.

DHS already has sufficient authority and resources without this additional power and jurisdiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC