Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The rich aren't rich without consumers.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 01:42 PM
Original message
The rich aren't rich without consumers.
Why not a consumer strike? Nothing but essentials. Food and fuel to get to work, medical care if needed. Otherwise, just quit buying trinkets. Make due with the clothing you have for the time being. Shut them down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, thing is that they no longer need us.
China and India with their rising middle class are their consumers.

Soon Americans will be as poor as Haitians and unable to consume much of anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. We could go on strike...it would work
But those of us who would consider this as an option would still come up of the short end of the stick, simply because no one wants to be put out...let someone else do it....is te prevailing attitude...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Not true
It should also be a taxpaying strike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. The simple response is....
that they can hold on longer then we can, they have all the resources.


Now we do need to practice 'educated' shopping practices. Don't like the causes that Target gives to? Don't shop there. And for God's sake block Fox channels on your TV and get the channel changed when you can away from home.O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Which will work out well, because consumers won't have any money
Edited on Fri Nov-19-10 01:51 PM by hughee99
once they lose their jobs. That will happen when rich people lay them off because their business isn't making money. The rich people will have the money to weather the storm, while the very people striking will lose their job, health insurance (if they even had that to begin with) and their life savings, not to mention their 401K (if they had one of those) as the stock prices tank because no one's buying anything.

But it sure will teach them a lesson!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. But if you squeeze every dime from the consumers you don't need them
You can then just enslave them for pennies a day and keep them as servants.

The rich want it all and they want it now!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I was laid off 2 years ago...going green this christmas with made in USA
gifts.... giving US dollars to the grandkids
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. A boycott of nonessential spending by consumers
would hurt consumers because so many workers now earn their income selling nonessentials.

And as India and China rise, American consumption will become a small piece of the pie.

But this is class war, and there is no war without casualties. And American consumption is still significant enough to have an impact, if only by driving the Dow down. Finally, the rich may be bulletproof, but the message sent to politicians would be significant--a people desperate and organized enough to boycott and desperate and organized enough to take their revolt further.

Finally, the American GDP is based about 70% on consumption. A drop in consumption would shake the economy and the markets, and it would ripple through global markets. This could be very big.

I'm on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC