Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

After Condom Remarks, Vatican Confirms Shift

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 05:05 PM
Original message
After Condom Remarks, Vatican Confirms Shift
After Condom Remarks, Vatican Confirms Shift

VATICAN CITY — Pope Benedict XVI’s recent comments about the use of condoms in select cases apply to women as well as men, the Vatican said Tuesday, a surprising first acknowledgment from the church that condom use can be part of a broader effort at AIDS prevention.

The clarification did not represent a change in church teaching on birth control, which remains forbidden, but it appeared to be a significant first response to critics who have long seen the church’s ban on condoms as a moral failing in light of the AIDS crisis.

In a book of interviews with Benedict published Tuesday, Benedict said that in some instances, using a condom might be a step toward a “moralization” of sexuality that could help reduce infection, specifying use by a “male prostitute” in the original German of the interview and in the English translation. In referring to homosexual sex, Benedict was citing a case where condoms would not be a form of contraception...

At a news conference on Tuesday, the Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said the pope had specifically told him on Monday that the issue was not procreation but disease prevention — regardless of the gender of the prostitute.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/24/world/europe/24pope.html?_r=1&ref=global-home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. New Pope-approved condoms....
The Pope's Hat brand featuring

The Tighter Miter for those of less than average girth.

The Lighter Miter for greater sensistivity.

The Gawd Almighty Model for those blessed in abundance,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Free rosary beads in every box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Out of curiousity, does this mean God changed his mind?
I understand that the pope communicates with God through prayer.

Having studied the Old Testament, I would prefer a God who can change his mind.

Ezekiel 9:5-7 (New International Version, ©2010)

" 5 As I listened, he said to the others, “Follow him through the city and kill, without showing pity or compassion. 6 Slaughter the old men, the young men and women, the mothers and children, but do not touch anyone who has the mark. Begin at my sanctuary.” So they began with the old men who were in front of the temple.

7 Then he said to them, “Defile the temple and fill the courts with the slain. Go!” So they went out and began killing throughout the city."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Barn door open. Horses out.
Sorry, the Vatican has already done too much damage with their Iron Age thinking. Just STFU, old man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. So much for infallibility.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I think he's infallible only when speaking directly of church matters.
When discussing prostitution and appurtenances thereof, apparently there's a lot more wiggle room. So to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. He must issue from a certain chair to invoke infallibility.
I think no one has done that since the 1956 veneration of Mary, and that did not involve condom use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Isn't it odd -- such adoration and veneration for **ONE** woman
and such blatant contempt for all other women (most of all, those who wish to become priests, followed by those who do not wish to bear a baby every 10-12 months, followed by nuns who are trying to remedy societal problems which Holy Mother Church refuses to acknowledge at all.)

The Vatican wants to investigate American nuns whose social outreach with the poor goes beyond what the Vatican considers permissible, and Republicans want to investigate climate scientists.

At least Teh Stuopid is not confined to one continent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Odd? Perhaps just the stark contrast between reality and the absolute.
A contrast so stark, the view becomes washed and the reality ... left to rot. It is done for self-importance. Is self-importance taken so far, stupid? I suppose.

But, then we're the nation that chooses newscasters by looks and good looks of young Miss American girls by their political views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. to think that it took them over 20 years to get to "condoms are ok for sex workers"
day late. dollar short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. 20 x 100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. It's only ok for male sex workers, however. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Can we please get more press on his statements regarding health care being a human right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Vatican has pulled itself into the mid-20th century.
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Pope Benedict sanctions gay sex, and this is not a HUGE STORY?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Err I hardly think he sanctioned it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. This is THE POPE, whose every syllable is pored over. His comment is WAY OUTSIDE traditional
Church condemnation of homosexual sex, the use of condoms AT ALL, and sex outside marriage.

IOW: The Pope has just stated that gay sex with condoms has his imprimatur, but that MARRIED HETEROsexuals, because they can reproduce, ARE STILL FORBIDDEN to use condoms.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. that's basically what he's saying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. So faithful, married women/mothers are still sentenced by church
doctrine to die of AIDS, whereas the church allows men visiting male prostitutes to protect themselves from such a fate.

I think he's not approving gay sex with condoms so much as disapproving of priests dying of AIDS, ackshully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. HUGE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. How does this change everything?
Basically, they're saying that condom use is technically okay for non-procreative sexual activities that are ALREADY AGAINST CHURCH TEACHINGS. It's about as relevant or as logically consistent as the DEA telling us that certain ways of consuming drugs is safer than others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Generic Other Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. it seems though, that the pope has only
agreed that it can be appropriate to use condoms to stem the spread of disease and might be used by prostitutes of either gender.
he has not changed the rules for those catholics who are not prostitutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC