LMAO! Faux News' Sister Channel in the UK Reports on Palin's North Korea Gaffe & Lists the Others

So, when she (or most likely her ghost writer) says http://www.facebook.com/notes/sarah-palin/a-thanksgiving-message-to-all-57-states/463364218434">on her FB page:



She (or most likely her ghost writer) is actually using Facebook to publicly complain about her employer (News Corp.). I wonder if she's allowed to do that in her contract.

It'd be awesome if this got her fired from Faux, but somehow I doubt it would happen.

ETA something I mentioned earlier which relates to this.

I get Sky on my satellite receiver and they did a 5 minute segment earlier about this & were mocking her.

They were saying her "base" won't care because all they care about is domestic 'policies', but as far as her reputation in the rest of the country is concerned, she's going to have a very hard time living this one down, lol.

wouldn't know the difference anyway, so she probably figures what the hell, just another note for the palm.

You're right that if he decides she can't run, she can't run, or he could make her fail if she tries. I'm wondering what makes you think he doesn't want her to run after all the effort Faux have put in to try and recreate her image?

thought his boy was Newt. He bought Newt years ago.

First, you build them up; then you pull them down.

When I first heard that he had made noises about it I thought it must have been a joke.

Newt Gingrich? Seriously?

We KNOW she's massively ignorant--so the gaffe "sticks". North, South...whatever...you know...

He wrote his own books by HIMSELF!

Not only graduated from Harvard, but MAGNA CUM LAUDE (she prob. doesn't even know what that means and the hard work it takes)!

Head of Harvard Law Review

I am smarter than Sarah.....what did she ever do...oh yeah...she quit as Alaska'a gov...not enough money!

qualify for law school let alone get into Harvard and graduate. Sometimes I wish there was a basic knowledge test that candidates had to pass before running for office.

don't seem to have a full grasp of what they're talking about ...

The right-wing can't control their Frankenstein. She's going down and it won't be pretty.

:popcorn:

Transcript:

"Well, North Korea - this is stemming from, I think, a greater problem when we're all sitting around asking 'oh no, what are we going to do', and we're not having a lot of faith that the White House is going to come out with a strong enough policy to sanction what it is that North Korea is going to do. This speaks to a bigger picture here that certainly scares me in terms of our national security policy. But obviously we've got to stand with out North Korean allies - we're bound to by treaty"

"South Korea ..."

"...Er, yeah ..."

Now, 'sanction' is a tricky word.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sanction?show=1&t=1290760067

As a verb, it means to approve:
1: to make valid or binding usually by a formal procedure (as ratification)
2: to give effective or authoritative approval or consent to

So, technically, she twice put herself on North Korea's side. Perhaps she doesn't know what 'sanction' means as a verb. But in that case, she shouldn't try to use it.

I had trouble with her use of the word sanction (in fact, I had trouble with her use of words) and couldn't quite put my finger on it.

You nailed it. Ouch!

:hi: