Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flying in Europe? Don't fear a pat-down. European Union governments take different approach ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:22 AM
Original message
Flying in Europe? Don't fear a pat-down. European Union governments take different approach ...
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/european-union/101125/airport-security-pat-down

But Europeans don’t need a rallying cry to resist what the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) calls “enhanced pat-downs” and aggrieved travelers are calling “government-approved groping” — it’s not happening in Europe.

Despite escalating warnings about terror attacks in or originating in Europe — Belgium arrested almost two dozen suspected terrorists this week, for example — none of the 27 EU governments have instructed airport officials to employ extra-rigorous pat-downs on travelers who set off alarms on the normal metal detectors or opt out of full-body scans in the few airports where they’re used.

Todd Curtis, an American aviation safety analyst and founder of the travel-information site AirSafe (www.airsafe.com ), said he’s taken a good long look at how Europe and the U.S. have responded to their threat levels. Curtis said he finds the Europeans’ more discreet approach to terror surveillance “more compatible with a risk-management approach that accepts that these kinds of threats can be reduced and controlled, but not eliminated.” The importance of that practical posture, he said, is that “if someone does take out an airplane or kill people in some kind of attack, it would not be a political disaster.”

Curtis said the American goal “to stop 100 percent of the attacks 100 percent of the time” has given birth to the much-maligned enhanced pat-down, because such an unforgiving aim justifies — to security planners — whatever extreme measures will achieve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. If the US wants to stop 100 % of the attacks, they'll need MRIs & CT scanners.
But even that won't be 100%, because while they are obsessing over invasive procedures on passengers, someone will be finding other ways to get explosives on airplanes.

Europe's risk management procedures make much more sense than the US belatedly over-reacting willy-nilly to every threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah but risk management doesn't generate profit for government cronies.
So that'll never work here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC