Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lack of 'defence' spending may cripple European ambitions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 09:56 AM
Original message
Lack of 'defence' spending may cripple European ambitions


HMS Ark Royal is due to be decommissioned as part of government spending cuts.

Lack of defence spending may cripple European ambitions
Uffe Ellemann-Jensen
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 28 November 2010 15.00 GMT

All over Europe, budgets are being pared as a new age of austerity takes hold. Defence expenditures are proving to be the easiest of targets. Even in the UK, David Cameron has joined the rush to slash defence spending.

These cuts are coming at a time when European efforts to shoulder a fair share of the western defence burden have been cast in doubt – not least in Afghanistan, where most European countries have limited their participation by insisting on a myriad "caveats" that usually serve to keep their troops far from the most dangerous zones.

Defence cuts are also happening at a time when Europe, for the first time in modern history, has been overtaken by Asia in terms of total defence spending. Western Europe's long-held position as the world's most important concentration of military power after the US and Russia appears to be over.

The US faces no serious challenge (not yet, at least) as the world's dominant military power. After all, the US spends almost as much on its armed forces as the rest of the world combined. But the picture is changing with the rapid growth of China's military expenditures. The official growth rate – 15% per year over the last decade – has increased substantially, and there is much hidden military spending as well. Growing anxiety among China's neighbours, particularly India, has led to remarkable increases in defence spending by other Asian powers as well.

Cuts in European defence spending, moreover, are starting to cause serious tensions within the Atlantic alliance. Nato is often described as a construction with two pillars and an architrave symbolising the common values that form the basis of the alliance. But even during the cold war, Americans often pointed out that the European pillar was lacking. Greater "burden-sharing" was a rote American demand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC