|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:20 PM Original message |
Why the fuck didn't they address the bush tax cuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. During the worst financial crisis in our lifetimes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. No, the tax cuts just added to the crisis. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. explain that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. People were fearful they were going to lose their jobs and homes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Perception v. Reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Beyond ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. "raising taxes"? How about canceling tax cuts for the richest 1% of Americans!!!??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Again. Perception. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:49 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 05:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
30. They didn't expire until the end of this year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 10:18 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Congress knew when they were going to expire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. LOL millions of people are CURRENTLY experiencing that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. If Congress cannot multitask..they shoud not be there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. Do you swallow RW talking points whole, or do you take bites? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. lololol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:51 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Not very nice... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
3. Good question n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. All fixed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. You're right. It's a DLC/republican dog and pony show. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
8. Letting them all expire is a sort of "nuclear option" that was supposed to bring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. The repukes are playing chess. The dems cannot get out of checkers mode. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
11. They thought they had plenty of time, since they didn't know Scott Brown would be elected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. It would have been alot smarter to let the public see the repukes refuse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
12. YES..and the fact that A huge percentage of that "big bad deficit" was created by Dimson!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
18. The excuse then was that they would expire at the end of this month |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
22. A lack of coordinated leadership and guts. EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:50 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Lack of ANY leadership, it would appear... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
26. When has Congress ever prioritized legislation due to expire more than a year from any date? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
29. Because there have been about a billion urgent things to do, and no one willing to do them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 02:22 AM Response to Original message |
32. The problem wasn't the Dem leadership. It was the Blue Dogs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 02:28 AM Response to Original message |
33. Don't think the votes would have been there in the Senate, then as now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC