Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dem leaders adopt Bush tactic of "Lying makes it so".

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:13 AM
Original message
Dem leaders adopt Bush tactic of "Lying makes it so".
There's not a rubber stamp or blank check here.

Steny Hoyer

Congratulations to the Democratic leadership. You just bought yourself a used war. And make no mistake, you now OWN this war. It is yours, and we here at ICT have changed the title for you from the "Bush Civil War" to the "Reid-Pelosi Civil War". After all, from this day forward every single death, civilian or military, is your doing. You had your chance to stop Bush, you chose your political careers, careers that were in NO danger (until now), over the lives of American soldiers and Iraqi civilians. You looked at the vast, unmitigated cluster-fuck that is the illegal war in Iraq and said, "I want me a big ol' piece of that!"

In South Africa during the 80's, there was a quaint little practice called "necklacing" which was carried out against government collaborators, real or imagined. It involved placing a car tire filled with gasoline around the neck of a bound victim and setting it afire. It is a grisly, evil method of execution.

The Democratic leadership has just committed the first act of "self-necklacing", hanging the war in Iraq around their neck, and setting it ablaze.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe YOU think so
But I very much doubt the American people see it that way. In fact, the way the American citizens view it, the Democrats gave them exactly what they wanted - a bill that funded the troops but set deadlines - and Bush vetoed it.

So no, the Democrats in no way, shape, or form own this war. Not by a long shot. And no amount of anti-war zealotry can change that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Name one "deadline" placed in this bill
Edited on Fri May-25-07 08:31 AM by Toots
Maybe by deadline you mean "benchmarks" and those were given to the Democrats by the Administration who desperately wants to Privatize Iraqs Oil which coincidentally enough is the very first "benchmark". Also should be noted the clause at the bottom which says Bush* doesn't have to abide by any of it if he doesn't want to...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Bush didn't veto this bill.
I was referring to the one we already passed. The one the American public wanted. The one that Bush vetoed.

And by vetoing THAT bill, Bush continues to own the war. And I feel very safe in saying that most people see it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Nope
They should have kept sending him the same bill until he signed it. Your theory is interesting and certainly the one the spineless leadership hopes we will buy, but such is not reality.

Nice spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Indeed. I'm certainly not buying the "B*sh's victory was inevitable" talking point.
And I can't believe how many here are spouting that drivel.

Not one here has yet explained how "single veto = no choice but unconditional surrender".

Actually, most of them never even try- they just yell "we don't
have the votes to override" as though the phrase trumps all discussion.

Are we supposed to think that every veto in history was followed
by giving the Prez exactly what he wanted? What nonsense! Who's
spreading this idea, FoxNews?

Seriously, WTF?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. People need to get it through their head
what is at stake. These idiots go to Washington and immediately start talking like politicians instead of human beings.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x972145
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Vash, the American people have already forgotten the bill that was vetoed.
Please. They have already forgotten who the new American Idol is, you think they will remember that little detail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. No way
Most people pay so little attention to what is going on they won't remember the bill bush vetoed. But this one they passed yesterday will be remembered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. The media
will be mentioning how the Dems "caved" every day for the next two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Then they turned around and gave Bush EXACTLY
what he demanded.

Every person I have spoken to has said the Dems caved, both liberal and conservative, so I don't know which American people you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. "Anti-war zealotry"?
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yeah
it seems that not wanting people to die is now a bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Well, fuck me if I don't want more of our service people to die
Edited on Fri May-25-07 03:46 PM by sfexpat2000
for LIES and for HALLIBURTON.

Fuck me if I don't want vets to get shafted by the selectively dysfunctional VA.

Fuck me if the sight of torture doesn't horrify me or if the sight of leveled towns and refugees doesn't scream "Freedom!" to me.

Anti-war zealot? You bet your ass I am.

Maybe YOU can sleep at night by counting appeasements to Junior's war crimes. I can't.

And we won't even raise the question of what those 10 million dollars a month OF OUR MONEY could do for us instead of getting Iraqis and Americans DEAD.

Anti-war zealot? You betchur ass.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. That's a great example of the mindset polluting the Dems in Congress.
The notion that the war is just another issue,
just one among many, and it's all just business
as usual.

We elected them, so they gave us that first "100 hours".
Now it's time for us to shut up and let them get back to
the same-old same-old.

And anyone who thinks the war is somehow important, urgent,
or pressing enough for them to take any REAL action to end
it is just a loony wild-eyed "zealot" who "doesn't understand
how things work".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. $100 to DU if the approval of Congress doesn't drop in the next poll
And by the way, go choke on your "anti-war zealotry" bullshit. If you think that speaking out passionately against the war is "zealotry", there are plenty of opportunites for you as a neocon shill. I hear William Kristol is looking for a deputy assistant ball-licker. You sound perfect for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R, Kelvin! K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Some Democrats who opposed the supplemental are now trying to burn their own party down
Edited on Fri May-25-07 08:49 AM by bigtree
despite the fact that the majority of our legislators still support an exit from Iraq this year. There will be other bills which include the timelines which were removed from the supplemental. All it takes is for legislators to vote in sufficient numbers to end the occupation and the troops come home, money and all. In that, it is still the republican obstructionists who are standing with Bush, in the way of bringing our troops home - not those legislators who let this funding bill pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Spare me the spin
I do not advocate "burning down the party", I advocate the truth. We must now support primary challengers to the leadership and replace them with people who WILL do what is right, not what keeps them drawing a paycheck.

They had the majority. They caved to Bush. All the "obstructionists" could do was prevent the veto from being overridden. All the Dems had to do was keep sending him the same bill until the GOP cracked under the growing unpopularity of the war. Instead, they got on their knees and kissed Bush's ass. Then they pretended they won a great victory, using the tried and true GOP tactic of "lying makes it so".

They rely on us to keep voting for them even when they betray us. Maybe you want to support these pieces of shit, but I have no intention.

At this point, if people continue to play the "lesser of two evils" game, then this country deserves extinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm really depressed and saddened. But I won't give up.
And if the Democratic Leadership Council believes we will roll over for their BS, they don't know us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. By no means am I saying give up
I now intend to encourage recruitment of primary challengers to the "leadership" and will send money to these challengers.

What we must do is make them pay. Personally, I intend to FAX these people every day with the number of dead Americans they are responsible for. NEVER let them forget that we will NOT forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. How can we calculate the dead?
There are our service people. There are Americans dying every day from this war driven policy that have never served.

I've been trying to total up the available numbers and I can't. KIA, WIA, Iraqis, contractors. It must be close to a million people by now.

This is Memorial Day weekend. WE WILL NEVER FORGET.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
21. Nancy's War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC