Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Black Soldiers were "caged" while fighting in Iraq: Rove emails found

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:06 AM
Original message
Black Soldiers were "caged" while fighting in Iraq: Rove emails found
Investigative reporter Greg Palast says 4.5 million votes will be shoplifted in 2008, thanks largely to the “Rove-bots” that have been placed in the Justice Department following the U.S. Attorney firings. Being the guy who uncovered the voter “purge lists” of 2000 that disenfranchised black voters, he’s worth listening to, even if the mainstream press chooses not to.



JD: Well, it is a direct mail term, but it’s also a voter supression term. Do no senators know that, not even Committee Chair John Conyers?

GP: Conyers knows — and he knows me. He’s keeping his powder dry. The others are clueless.

Caging works like this. Hundreds of thousands of Black and Hispanic voters were sent letters — do not forward. Letters returned as undeliverable (”caged”) were used as evidence the voter didn’t live at their registered address. The GOP goons challenged these voters’ right to cast ballots — and their votes were lost.

But whose letters were caged? Here’s where the game turns to deep evil. They targeted Black students on vacation, homeless men — and you’ll love this — Black soldiers sent overseas. They weren’t living at their home voting address because they were shivering under a Humvee in Falluja.

more at:
http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/05/24/justice-department-scandal-greg-palast/

via:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/5/25/9218/81157
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. republicons HATE our soldiers and veterans
Edited on Fri May-25-07 09:31 AM by SpiralHawk
More proof with this. Denying men and women in uniform the right to their legitimate votes.

They trash talk our vets, and screw our soldiers and vets with benefits and the hospitals.

I think the republicons hate honorable troops and veterans because so many republicon leaders are shameless CHICKENHAWKs and War profiteers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. BushInc loves Defense Industry Executives and hates the troops and their families.
Edited on Fri May-25-07 09:16 AM by blm
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Those rat bastards
:grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
44. MF'in rat bastards at that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick and recommend
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. yep
here's a kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. thanks greg palast for bringing this to light
what a bunch of treacherous evil bastards - hell's too good for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiteinthewind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R! nt
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. But it's against the law to target people of color like this, right?
If it's against the law, where's the investigation? Oh, I forgot. The foxes have taken over the henhouse. Bringing charges against Republicans is a sure way to get your career shitcanned if you work at Justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
60. a la Nixon, if a Republicon does is, ipso facto it's not illegal
we joke, but I think they really believe that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. One reason the 500 e-mails have gotten little play
is that they very well may be fakes, even if whoever BBC talked to wouldn't come out and say it. As the article states:

In an updated new version of his best-selling book, Armed Madhouse, Palast lays out the case for the future theft of the presidency, along with lots of other Executive malfeasance. I chatted with him about the role of the Justice Department in this scheme, and what it means for the viability of our “democracy.”

JEFF DIEHL: First off, the “lost” emails. I guess you’re confident those 500 emails aren’t themselves a hoax? Considering the source?

GREG PALAST: Oddly, the GOP verified their authenticity to BBC. I almost fell over dead when they did that.

JD: How did they do that exactly?

GP: We asked them on camera. They did not deny they were the party’s internal emails — just disagreed what the “caging” lists were. Saying, for example, they were “donor” lists. Men in homeless shelters?

Remember, there’s no First Amendment in England. I’m wrong, I’m sued, I’m broke, I’m toast.


What we do know is that Goodling testified that Paul McNulty misrepresented something very important to the Committee. DoJ was aware of problems with Tim Griffin's nomination. Goodling, hereself, had briefed him that Griffin was involved in "caging". While Goodling's testimony obscured her own understanding of the meaning of that term, it shows that Rove's former head of research was appointed US Attorney despite known violations of federal election laws.

If Griffin was involved in racially-based voter suppression (of course he was, he was Rove's chief of "research"), that is very serious stuff, indeed, and we will hear more about it. Regardless of whether the 500 e-mails are real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. The emails are not fakes
Do you even know how Palast got those emails?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Everyone understands where Palast got the emails, but there is a remote chance...
that the emails could be a false flag operation. Think Dan Rather, and the hit he took on the Sixty Minutes piece. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. R U kidding?
So, you're telling me that all those wacky kids @ the RNC sent fake emails to georgewbush.org? How did they do that? Did the all spoof their servers? Do you have any idea how hard it is to fake the Headers of an incoming email? Do you really think they are that clever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. I said a remote chance
I believe the emails to be genuine, but at the same time, I could believe a Herculean effort by Rove et al. to plant disinformation is in the realm of possibilities. Nothing more, nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slowry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Yeah, it would take a herculean effort.
And it would be pointless, because the second they were shown to be fake, there'd be no denying who created them. It doesn't make sense for so many reasons... 100% real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. It's extremely easy to forge fake headers
and bogus hard copies of e-mails. It can very easily be done with WORD or by setting up an internal proxy server.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #29
47. Yes, a hard copy is easy to fake
Edited on Fri May-25-07 07:09 PM by blogslut
However, downloading emails, containing hundreds of fake Headers, from a server is a hell of a trick. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. rovaphobia
This is the kind of thing that paralyzes us in the face of overwhelming evidence.

Somehow if we discover proof it must all be the manipulation of Karl Rove.

We need to play an offence game.

Palast's reporting has been solid. He is an investigative Journalist, not a TV figurehead. I don't know whether or not I respect Dan Rather but there is definitely a difference between the men and the evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. That's referenced in the article
Palast says he got them from the guy who runs Whitehouse.org, a gag site, from someone who (it's assumed) confused that site with WhiteHouse.gov

Palast is taking a risk, even if some unnamed person at the White House doesn't deny they're authentic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slowry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
52. 0% risk.
I don't know if it's because I'm personally familiar with the technology, and with the story, but it's ridiculously obvious to me that these can't be fake. The effort to cull all these names, script conversations, include links, forge headers, dates, and so much more, then send them all to your enemy, for no real benefit, is absurd beyond belief.

They aren't fake, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slowry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. No chance
Given the names, dates, email addresses, sources, links, attachments, and other header information, these are decidedly real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
41. AND the fact that WE read them HERE when they were first found
Edited on Fri May-25-07 06:30 PM by SoCalDem
in 2001..(I think)..and the media said "ho-hum"..old news..move on..get over it..Sore Loserman etc".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. 2004
Edited on Fri May-25-07 07:16 PM by blogslut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slowry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #41
50. Thank you.
Even the most radical people (not pointing fingers at anyone here, lol) will second-guess the painfully obvious, because "if it was true, it would be bigger news", knowing full well the opposite is the truth. The bigger a scandal, the more it will be ignored, or contained; we can try to think up all kinds of excuses, but that is the harsh reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. K*R!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. Read this last night
Am completely horrified. 2008, stolen already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
14. Thats kind of .... evil
I don't think they should be doing that. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. Who here is surpised by this information?
Damn few of us I imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slowry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
19. k&r definitive proof (as if more was needed) that the msm is useless, complicit n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
20. Remind me again please... who did Griffin replace in AZ? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. To answer your question NO one
Tim Griffin replaced Bud Cummins in Arkansas... Not AZ

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Ah... maybe that's why I had so much trouble....
Thanks for clearing that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. I was sent such a letter. I'm a white, middle-class working joe...
I was outraged to the point my friends and family had to literally intervene to keep me from driving to the repuke attorney's home, (the person who challenged my voting rights), and shoving the letter up his ass. I still have his name, number and address. Fortunately his little tactic didn't work with me as I was living at the address in which I registered to vote, and as a result, received the letter challenging my right to vote in '04. There are days my friends, that I still have visions of myself smacking that little son-of-a-bitch in the mouth, or stomping a mud-puddle in his ass, and walking it dry. Just a little piece of friendly advice to those who might engage in voter suppression tactics like this. It's your name and address on the return portion of that envelope, and that address is legitimate. If these fuckers try to pull this shit again in '08, I predict there could be some nasty backlash. Fuck with my rights once, shame on me. Fuck with my rights again, and let's just say, I know where you live...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Care to Share
I think you should post the info you have on this usurper. It is time to call out these crooks and expose them to the light of day.

So, please please post the info here here and everywhere....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Believe me I was going to post a copy of it, but I was told I could be sued for it.
Fuck it though, I'll just block out my personal info, and scan it next week when I return to work. I will post it for all to see. I still have it because I want to be reminded what bastards Republicans are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Wow, who told you you could be sued
It seems to me that anything that is mailed directly to you is now your property and you can do as you wish with the mail.

Why would anyone sue you over a "direct mail-out" (Monica's term), why would THAT upset anyone???:shrug:

Why should they feel the need to be so defensive, by suing you for exposing their scam?!?!?

Monica: "that it just -- that it's a direct mail term that's used by vendors in that circumstance."

Who ARE the VENDORS???????

I look forward to your post exposing the scum bags. Just in case I miss it please purdy please PM me with the info....




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. I heard of those; I'm almost completely certain you can't be sued. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
37. thats the spirit
Fear not, these dogs will press the issue until we're looking at them over iron sights.
Or perhaps a running chain saw.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ecumenist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
42. LOL!! You go Envirobat!! They tried that crap with me this past election cycle
Edited on Fri May-25-07 06:45 PM by Ecumenist
My husband and I reregistered because since the presidential election, we'd moved. We both vote permament absentee, due to our schedules. I called and spoke to the registar's office and crossed all my "t's" and dotted my "I's". Strangely, my husband's ballot, which he didn't call for, showed up on time. Mine NEVER DID. My husband is registered independent and I am a registered Democrat. Well, I walked my cute little Caramel behind to the polling place, gave my name and confirmatory imformation and asked why my absentee hadn't showed. They looked on they books and told me that I wasn't registered as absentee!! I found out that thousands of democrats and a not a few independents had the same thing happen to them in Sacramento, Placer, Eldorado, Yolo and Sutter counties. I believe 1001 percent that this was exactly what happened in at least 2002, 2004, 2006 and they will try to do the same thing in 2008. We have to be proactive and like you said, stomp a hole in their asses if they try it again!! BTW, welcome to DU EnviroBat..Right Glad to have you here!! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmylavin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #42
55. Mine was even weirder!
When I moved to Los Angeles from New Jersey, I reregistered - through the DMV - before the 2004 election. Registered as a Democrat. RECEIVED my voter info book and polliing place info. When I went to vote, I wasn't on the rolls! They had my name and address in another book, but that one didn't qualify me to vote. I had to vote with a provisional ballot. I WAS FURIOUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ecumenist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #55
59. That's fugging ridiculous!! It's seems a bit strange that this just HAPPENS to
happen to Dems. As i said earlier, Himself received his ballot and all pertinent material. I didn't get a bloody thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'd like to know why the AMERICAN media wouldn't pick this up while BBC did!
this isn't new information but still has American media picked up on it? Why is Tim Griffin still USA for Arkansas? I wish some prominent attorney (RFK Jr and Mike Papantonio come to mind) needs to get a hold of one of these disenfranchised soldiers and take this to court and seek HUGH!!! penalties from the RNC, Tim Griffin, Monica Goodling, kkkarl and other "opposition researchers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWilliamsamh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:48 PM
Original message
Palast says he works for the BBC BECAUSE he can really report (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. The American media is...............
The American media is so tame on criticism of the Bush Administration. It was like 24/7 attacks on The Clinton Administration in the media. The media would give credence to the wildest alegations against Clinton, yet, with Bush, clear evidence of wrong doing is overlooked. The contrast is startling. Unless there are steps taken to bring back an unbiased media there is little chance for the American people to understand what has happened to their country. I'm exhausted by the entire thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slowry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
53. We say time and time again the the MSM is useless, or worse.
It really is true, and it's gotten so far beyond disgusting, that I don't understand how anyone questions this. They not only don't give a fuck about the truth, they consciously obscure and/or bury it. It's the rule, not the exception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
32. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.0
==================



This week is our second quarter 2007 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend on donations
from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
36. These "cons" have no shame at all. This is past despicable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
38. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
39. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
40. These cretins will abuse us at any chance.
The GOP is a gang of thieves posturing as an American political party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
43. I'd be shocked if a year has gone by since white folks first let black folks vote...
... where white folks didn't do that at any available opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
45. This needs to be UNDONE! Thank
you, Greg Palast for uncovering this diabolical scam to steal our votes for the 2008 election. How amazing to ferret this out..WOW!

Fuckin' rove can't win fair and square so he has to get his pigsty ass thinkin' on what he can steal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
46. The repukes support Lockheed Martin and their weapons, not the soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
48. This Is A Tactic That Was Tried During Viet Nam Too!
They wanted to sent them to Chicago from Ft. Hood, TX to attack Anti-War Demonstrators at the 1968 Democratic Convention!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
51. And there you have it--the holiday weekend news dump. Disgusting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luna_C_06 Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
54. Would it help if we sent this to Olbermann? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grandrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
56. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
57. "He’s keeping his powder dry"
For when? Next Nov. when we might have a consensus perhaps?

I understand, but I'm tired.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spock_is_Skeptical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
58. pretty messed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
61. Meanwhile, those voting were having their votes switched
If you survived the caging, purges, long lines, and challenges, there was
still a 3% chance your Kerry vote was switched to a Bush vote. See this proof:

In a large subset of Ohio voters, 1 of every 34 votes in the 2004 Presidential election in Ohio, a 6% Kerry-Bush vote-switch is evidenced. This is blatant, and yet the authorities have yet to respond. The US Attorney for Ohio has been informed, and the FBI has also. Meanwhile, Gonzales said, at the Press Club speech, that DoJ takes "voter fraud" seriously. I guess he really does understand the difference between "election fraud" and "voter fraud" after all!

Read the article:
he 2004 Ohio Presidential Election: Cuyahoga County Analysis
How Kerry Votes Were Switched to Bush Votes
http://jqjacobs.net/politics/ohio.html

"I define "vote-switching" as major candidate cross-voting. One major candidate cross-vote changes the election margin by two votes; as one major candidate loses a vote the other gains the cross-vote. Vote-switching is distinguished from cross-voting because impact on results varies depending on for which candidate cross-votes are counted. Vote-switching results when the two major candidates are collocated in the same ballot order position, either from ballot switching between such precincts or voters cross-voting at such locations....."

Here is a thumbnail of a deskpicture-size screen capture illustrating the evidence.
The article introduced the notation. Full-sized image URL: jqjacobs.net/politics/images/cuyahoga_precincts_subsets.jpg



There is a PowerPoint introduction to the article too:



http://jqjacobs.net/politics/vote_switching.ppt


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
62. This is just unbelievable. First they start with the vulnerable,
and then they move up the ladder until none of are votes can be verified. They have had many election cycles to perfect the crime. This might seem like an insignificant issue to some here, but when I voted in the last presidential election, there were folks asking me for my birth date. I asked if it was necessary to vote, nope but they sill wanted it. I asked the women in charge of the voting place if she could remove my birth date from their list. She did,but next they will move my birth date,ss, address, blood sample, etc..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC