Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Administration To ‘Skim Off Border Patrol Agents’ For Duty In Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:07 PM
Original message
Bush Administration To ‘Skim Off Border Patrol Agents’ For Duty In Iraq
Edited on Fri May-25-07 02:10 PM by babylonsister
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/25/border-patriol-to-iraq/

Bush Administration To ‘Skim Off Border Patrol Agents’ For Duty In Iraq

During a visit to the U.S-Mexico border last month, President Bush stated that “securing the border is a critical part of a strategy for comprehensive immigration reform.” Yesterday, Bush claimed that his administration had already “stepped up efforts to improve border security,” touting his attempts to “double the size of the Border Patrol.”

Today, however, such commitments ring hallow as Govs. Janet Napolitano (D-AZ) and Bill Richardson (D-NM) have found that the defense contractor DynCorp has been authorized by the Bush Administration to hire as many as 120 “current and former U.S. Border Patrol agents.”

DynCorp “is offering $134,100 for a one-year stay, plus a $25,000 signing bonus,” a reported 70% pay raise. Further, “(t)he first $90,000 in income is tax free, and housing and food are free.”

Richardson and Napolitano both expressed outrage about the plan, saying in a letter to Bush that the plan “makes no sense“:

(A)t a time when violence is once again flaring up on our own border, it makes no sense for the United States State Department to empower a company to hire away as many as 120 veteran Border Patrol agents to serve as mentors to train Iraqis… We should be focused on supporting our nation’s security efforts along the Mexican and Canadian border instead of hampering by sending our best agents to a war zone in Iraq.

The Bush administration’s attempts to “skim off Border Patrol agents” for duty in Iraq is made worse in light of the recent decision to withdraw half of the 6,000 National Guard troops temporarily stationed at the border.

The Bush administration had promised to replace the Guardsmen with an “equal number of new Border Patrol agents,” but “fewer than 350 new agents have been hired.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Keeping America safe
MY ASS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. If there are any National Guardsmen left in Texas
bush should activate them to pick onions. Texas has tightened up its immigration laws and there are fewer immigrants to pick produce and so far (as of yesterday) farmers haven't been able to hire anyone to do that (according to NBC news last night.) So onions are rotting in the field. Meanwhile conservatives are planning for the big memorial day weekend barbecue and will soon be bitching about the increased price of onions. Dontcha just get a warm and fuzzy about conservative values?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush is always willing to forsake the people of America, and America itself,
in order to send troops/money/equipment/whatever to some foreign country.

You'd think he was the Dictator of Iraq, and he's just playing President so he can pull resources out of America for his country. That's what it really looks like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. From what I saw when I lived in AZ
losing border patrol agents isn't a huge loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes, but it sure would be nice if we had any kind of a force left in the
US, just in case we needed someone for something, ya know? As I see it, every available body is being sent to Iraq, and it wouldn't surprise me if the Boy Scouts are next. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. I HEARD THIS ON ONE OF THE NEWS CAST A COUPLE DAYS AGO AND
it was totally skimmed over..and ignored..i wish i could remember where i heard it..but i did!!

k&r

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Boy scouts next.
Don't laugh. My nephew was recruited right out of his troop. He's going into the Marines before the summer is out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. 120 "current or retired" out of 18,000 Border Patrol agents.
There goes the border. Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Do you approve of * pimping federal employees for private jobs? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good Lord.
Just when I'm thinking things couldn't get worse....they manage to surprise me....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. oh well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC