Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court won't hear students' challenge to Va. ban on alcohol ads

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:55 AM
Original message
Supreme Court won't hear students' challenge to Va. ban on alcohol ads
Supreme Court won't hear students' challenge to Va. ban on alcohol ads
Case returns to district court for trial

VIRGINIA -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a case challenging Virginia’s ban on alcohol-related advertising in college newspapers.

The case now returns to the district court, which originally found the ban unconstitutional on its face. Two student papers, the University of Virginia’s Cavalier Daily and Virginia Tech’s Collegiate Times, filed a lawsuit challenging the ban in June 2006.

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the ban in April, finding it did not violate the First Amendment on its face.

“The response from the Supreme Court is unfortunate,” said Peter Velz, editor in chief of The Collegiate Times.

http://www.splc.org/news/newsflash.asp?id=2177

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Government trimming back freedom of speech despite the 1st Amendment?
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 09:51 AM by sharesunited
Clearly, the pretend "right to keep and bear arms" could use some trimming back to save college students as well. Despite the 2nd Amendment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Tech_massacre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Didn't actually read it, did ya?
"The case now returns to the district court, which originally found the ban unconstitutional on its face.

Frank LoMonte, executive director of the Student Press Law Center, said the case now goes to trial in the district court on two unresolved issues: Whether the ban is unconstitutional in the way it is enforced on the two papers, and whether the ban violates the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause because it targets only college newspapers. The first could invalidate the ban only for the two plaintiffs. The other could strike down the ban entirely. "



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The second ammendment could do with repeal, never mind trimming. N.T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC