Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bipartisan tax plan will cost $857 billion over 10 years, say estimates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 01:43 PM
Original message
Bipartisan tax plan will cost $857 billion over 10 years, say estimates
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/domestic-taxes/133227-bipartisan-tax-plan-will-cost-857-billion-over-10-years

The tax plan brokered between the White House and Senate Republicans will cost add $857.8 billion to the deficit over 10 years, according to the Joint Taxation Committee's and Congressional Budget Office's scores of the legislation.

The measure, which comes up in the Senate for its first vote Monday, would cost more than the $787 billion economic stimulus bill passed in February 2009.

The score of the bipartisan tax legislation shows a loss of $721 billion in revenue over the next decade.

(snip)

In addition, the two-year patch for the alternative minimum tax will cost $136 billion, the estate tax of a 35 percent rate with an exemption up to $5 million will cost $68 billion and the one-year two percentage points reduction of the payroll tax for employers has an estimated cost of $111.6 billion, the JCT estimates showed.
Refresh | +10 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. $87 billion per annum
in a $1.4 trillion budget is statistical noise.

The most remarkable thing about the last month or so is Herbert Hoover becoming a Democratic idol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. 857 billion leading straight into the peak boomer retirement event
This is so totally fucked it is beyond comprehension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Creative Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. How can that be when the tax deal is for two years and the SS deal
is for one year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. It is a 2 year deal, not a ten year deal.
Edited on Sat Dec-11-10 01:52 PM by emulatorloo
"I just know it will be made permanent" is not a justification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. And liberals are supposed to want that
We are not supposed to be worrying about deficits in the short term: we believe in government spending in recessionary times as a way to support a flagging economy. We are not Republican deficit hawks.

Dean Baker, an extremely liberal economist, explained this to you Tuesday, so you should listen: http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/12/07/in_defense_of_giving_money_to_rich_people/


We should not be "deficit hawks here. The preponderance of that money (more than $450 billion of it) goes to middle-class and poor people; $135 billion of it accounts for the tax cuts to the wealthy and the temporary estate tax modifications the Repubicans wanted. Overall: we win. But more important, the economy wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Borrowing notation from logic...
Edited on Sat Dec-11-10 01:57 PM by Davis_X_Machina
...DemocraticUnderground.com isn't actually DemocraticUnderground.com, it's ~RepublicanUnderground.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Take away what the 75k and up crowd get and tell me again.
This bullshit is not for the poor and working class but for the rich and near rich.

The middle class is a fucking fig leaf. The idea that this is targeting most people with substantive relief is laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. In other words...
A cold, hard, small, disciplined, real Democratic party is the only thing that will save the country. And if failing to mitigate human suffering is the price, so be it.

Oh, sure, some people will carp, and point out that during this process real people will suffer real pain that could otherwise have been averted. When the historical necessity of their sacrifice is explained to them properly, however, they will come around.

Some day, when real progressives finally take power, we can recognize their sacrifice. A memorial, something tasteful, and not too grandiose on the Mall? Or a commemorative stamp...we could have Banksey do it; think how cool that would be.

Remind me again, when did Lenin die? Did Lenin die?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Nobody is suffering because of these fucking tax cuts.
If Democrats were concerned about the unemployed they would have indexed the extensions to the unemployment rate but instead they wanted people to slip off as "discouraged" to lower the number while they used the constant reauthorizations as a political attack.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. This deal raises taxes on the working poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. It does not raise taxes on the working poor relative to no deal at all. A family of 4 at the poverty
line would be paying over 3k more with no deal than with a deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. that is factually incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. 10 years doesn't make sense.
What in this agreement lasts 10 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. And that money will come from........?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Herbert Hoover became a Democrat when....
John Maynard Keynes died for our sins, and in vain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. The tax plan will be good for the economy
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/10/AR2010121006994.html

Economic forecasters are boosting their year-end and 2011 estimates for U.S. growth, prompted by a narrowing trade deficit, an unexpectedly large round of proposed tax cuts and an increase in consumer confidence

The revisions this week were substantial, as analysts took particular note of the tax deal struck between the White House and congressional Republicans.

The agreement included some provisions that were already expected and built into forecasts, such as an extension of the Bush-era tax cuts. But other elements of the deal, such as a proposed 2 percentage point reduction in the Social Security payroll tax, were not anticipated.

Analysts say the extra tens of billions of dollars that workers will find in their paychecks at the start of the year could add as much as a half of a percentage point or more to U.S. economic growth in 2011.

The tax package "injects meaningful extra stimulus into the economy," said Nigel Gault, chief U.S. economist for the IHS Global Insight consulting firm, who raised his projection for growth next year from 2.4 percent to 3.0 percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Have we not yet learned that economists know nothing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
18. class warfare in action.

there is no other explanation. this is a classic "starve the beast" strategy, btw. next step is drowning "the government" (code word for any public/social services/safety net for the workers, etc.) in a fucking bath tub.

:nuke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC