Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

thank God harry reid is pushing for internet gambling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 10:46 AM
Original message
thank God harry reid is pushing for internet gambling
:sarcasm:


Harry Reid Pushing to Legalize Online Gambling


As a lame-duck Congress winds down and a small army of Democratic legislators prepare to vacate their offices in Washington, U.S. Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is quietly pushing a bill that would legalize online gambling.

Such a law would handsomely benefit Reid’s own state, where gambling is the biggest industry. Currently off-shore operators of Internet poker and gambling websites reap an estimated $5 billion annually from cyber-casinos, and some of Reid’s constituents, who operate the nation’s largest casinos, naturally want their hefty piece of the pie.

While four years ago Congress passed legislation banning banks and credit card companies from transferring payments to gambling websites, proponents of online poker hope they still have a window of opportunity to overturn the ban and legalize Internet gaming through the support of lame-duck Democrats. Earlier this year the House Financial Services Committee signed off on a bill that would establish regulatory oversight for online gambling.

But Three Republican House members recently wrote to Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to express their opposition to the bill, citing the harm online gambling would inflict on individuals and families. “Congress should not take advantage of the young, the weak, and the vulnerable in the name of new revenues to cover more government spending,” wrote Representatives Spencer Bachus (Alabama), Dave Camp (Michigan), and Lamar Smith (Texas).

http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/5468-harry-reid-pushing-to-legalize-online-gambling:sarcasm:
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Political payback for Vegas desperadoes Harrah's and MGM
Truth serum would probably reveal he knows it doesn't have a prayer of passing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. It is my number one priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. guess it's harry's too
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Fasicnating to see how this is written and who is doing the complaining.
Gaming, in some form or another, is legal in all but two states of the union.

Nevada has an express Internet prohibition - i.e., they have a law that specifically denies legal internet gaming. Granted, the reason they have it is the same reason they don't have a state lottery (cuts into casino revenue) . . . but they have it.

Alabama, Michigan, and Texas do NOT have that law.

They all have legal gaming of some sort. Alabama allows charitable (read that as bingo, which is often hardly charitable), pari-mutuel (pool betting, usually sport or racing), and Indian casinos; Michigan allows all forms of gaming, including commerical casinos; Texas allows charitable, pari-mutuel, lotteries, and racetrack gaming.

Pot, meet kettle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. What will they trade away for this one? I know - let's privatize U.S. nuclear forces - bids?
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 11:12 AM by leveymg
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. I thought this was SOP for republicans?
“Congress should not take advantage of the young, the weak, and the vulnerable in the name of new revenues to cover more government spending,” wrote Representatives Spencer Bachus (Alabama), Dave Camp (Michigan), and Lamar Smith (Texas).

Taking advantage of the young weak and vulnerable is what Republicans are all about isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC