Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Reich: Why Bill Clinton's...view of tax cuts should be disregarded

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 02:06 PM
Original message
Robert Reich: Why Bill Clinton's...view of tax cuts should be disregarded
Why Bill Clinton's Favorable View of Obama's Tax Deal Should Be Disregarded
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/why-bill-clintons-favorab_b_795405.html

Bill Clinton seems the perfect validator for Barack Obama -- which is why the president is utilizing the former president for selling his tax deal. After all, the economy boomed when Clinton was president and 22 million net new jobs were created. From a more narrow political perspective -- and this is important to Democrats in Washington -- Bill Clinton was reelected, even though he lost both houses of Congress in the 1994 midterms.

But the analogy falls apart as soon as you realize Clinton's economy was vastly different from Obama's. The recession Clinton inherited was relatively small, and caused by the Fed raising interest rates too high to ward off inflation. So it could be reversed by the Fed lowering interest rates -- as the Fed did in 1994. By 1995, the so-called "jobless recovery" had morphed into a full-blown jobs recovery. By 1996, at pollster Dick Morris's urging, Clinton could proclaim to the American people "you've never had it so good, and you ain't seen nothing yet."

.... Whole post is at link above...


Seems there is a lot of dissension on this and not just from the expected dissenters. :shrug:
Refresh | +13 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. To those who unrec this post, why not counter it with discussion?
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 02:42 PM by hlthe2b
I find it unfathomable that those that disagree would prefer to ignore Robert Reich's comments, unrec the post so that it disappears, (and that of Howard Dean) this morning, rather than offer counter discussion. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. here's a rec to offset one of them - thanks for posting; I had wondered about this
because Reich's views (expressed earlier) were so different from Clinton's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC