Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has there ever been a human society without the double standard?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Anthropology Group Donate to DU
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 08:27 AM
Original message
Has there ever been a human society without the double standard?
Edited on Mon Sep-24-07 08:27 AM by raccoon
I refer, of course, to the double standard about sex.


edited for clarity.

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think any society has ever treated the sexes as
completely equal, but outside of that there are almost infinite variations on what defines masculinity and femininity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, I believe so.
Edited on Mon Sep-24-07 01:45 PM by Cleita
I think among the Hawaiians and other Polynesian societies, women had equal say, many of them even becoming chiefs. I think many First Nation tribes in the Americas are also egalitarian with women having an equal say in the affairs of the tribe. When I was in Alaska last month, the Tlingit guides (women) told us that their society was matriarchal. Now I don't know if they meant the women were in charge or that they were equal to men. I wasn't there long enough to find out.

I do believe that work is divided into women's and men's work because the women by and large raise the children so they have to be able to do work that lets them multi-task and raise the children while they are working. This is probably why women did the gathering mostly rather than much hunting, which was left to the men. It was safer and something you could do while carrying a baby on your back and having toddlers trailing behind you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. I guess I didn't make myself clear. Sorry about that.
Edited on Mon Sep-24-07 02:02 PM by raccoon
I was referring to the idea that it's ok for men to have sex as much as they want to, but a woman who has uncommitted sex is a ho.


"A notorious type of double standard is the classic "studs vs. sluts" model, in which a man who has sex with many female partners is considered a "stud" or "player" (which are often considered compliments), while a woman who has sex with many male partners is considered a "slut" or "skank" (which are highly pejorative terms). "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_standard
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Anthropology Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC